From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: grawity@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix a race between poll and write in tpm-dev-common
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:09:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8451bf41-1055-4538-1c05-36a97889e174@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552951167.2785.22.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 3/18/19 4:19 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> @@ -203,12 +203,14 @@ __poll_t tpm_common_poll(struct file *file,
>> poll_table *wait)
>> __poll_t mask = 0;
>>
>> poll_wait(file, &priv->async_wait, wait);
>> + mutex_lock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
>>
>> if (!priv->response_read || priv->response_length)
>> mask = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
>> else
>> mask = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
>>
>> + mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
> This doesn't do anything to address the theory that the queued work
> hasn't run before the poll wakes up, does it? If you have an
> alternative theory, could you explain it?
Right, it needs to be guarded by the mutex and also the condition
should only check priv->response_length, because we only care
about if there is data to read. The response_read flag only
prevents double writes, without reading in the middle (or a timeout)
which clean it. I will send a v2 soon.
Thanks,
--
Tadeusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 22:18 Tadeusz Struk
2019-03-18 23:19 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-19 19:09 ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2019-03-21 13:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 13:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8451bf41-1055-4538-1c05-36a97889e174@intel.com \
--to=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=grawity@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®