mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: grawity@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix a race between poll and write in tpm-dev-common
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:09:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8451bf41-1055-4538-1c05-36a97889e174@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552951167.2785.22.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On 3/18/19 4:19 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> @@ -203,12 +203,14 @@ __poll_t tpm_common_poll(struct file *file,
>> poll_table *wait)
>>  	__poll_t mask = 0;
>>  
>>  	poll_wait(file, &priv->async_wait, wait);
>> +	mutex_lock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
>>  
>>  	if (!priv->response_read || priv->response_length)
>>  		mask = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
>>  	else
>>  		mask = EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
>>  
>> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
> This doesn't do anything to address the theory that the queued work
> hasn't run before the poll wakes up, does it?  If you have an
> alternative theory, could you explain it?

Right, it needs to be guarded by the mutex and also the condition
should only check priv->response_length, because we only care
about if there is data to read. The response_read flag only
prevents double writes, without reading in the middle (or a timeout)
which clean it. I will send a v2 soon.

Thanks,
-- 
Tadeusz

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 22:18 Tadeusz Struk
2019-03-18 23:19 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-19 19:09   ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2019-03-21 13:34   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 13:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8451bf41-1055-4538-1c05-36a97889e174@intel.com \
    --to=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=grawity@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®