mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: always handle RPC_SIGNALLED earlier in nfsd4_cb_sequence_done()
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:06:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84527e1a-a163-49b3-8335-a551c2822929@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6196ed07e6db1bf664d2f10280cbe0e80857583e.camel@kernel.org>

On 1/22/25 10:44 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 10:20 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On 1/22/25 10:10 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> The v4.0 client always restarts the callback when the connection is shut
>>> down (which is indicated by RPC_SIGNALLED()). The RPC is then requeued
>>> and the result eventually should complete (or be aborted).
>>>
>>> The v4.1 code instead processes the result and only later decides to
>>> restart the call. Even more problematic is the fact that it releases the
>>> slot beforehand. The restarted call may get a new slot, which would
>>> could break DRC handling.
>>
>> "break DRC handling" -- I'd like to understand this.
>>
>> NFSD always sets cachethis to false in CB_SEQUENCE, so there is no DRC
>> for these operations. The only thing the client saves is the slot
>> sequence number IIUC.
>>
>> Is retrying an uncached operation via a different slot a problem?
>>
> 
> Ahh, I missed that we always set cachethis to false. So, there is
> probably now a problem with the DRC after all. Still, I don't see a
> good argument for processing the CB_SEQUENCE result, when we intend to
> retransmit the call anyway.

I expect that the rationale is that the slot sequence number needs to be
advanced appropriately before the slot can be used again.


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-22 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-22 15:10 Jeff Layton
2025-01-22 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2025-01-22 15:35   ` Tom Talpey
2025-01-22 15:44   ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-22 16:06     ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-01-22 16:50       ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-23 14:37         ` Chuck Lever
2025-01-23 14:57           ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84527e1a-a163-49b3-8335-a551c2822929@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®