From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org,
acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:03:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84683aa7-58ad-85f8-327b-daed2f704834@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yx8GBq1FJN49iJs9@sirena.org.uk>
On 9/12/22 15:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:40:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>> + /* Captured BRBE buffer - copied as is into perf_sample_data */
>> + struct perf_branch_stack brbe_stack;
>> + struct perf_branch_entry brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
>
> It looks like perf_branch_entry is intended to be the variably
> sized entries array at the end of perf_branch_stack? That could
That is right. Because max number of entries for brbe_entries[] array
is platform dependent i.e BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES on powerpc, MAX_LBR_ENTRIES
on x86 and BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES on arm64.
The generic definition
struct perf_branch_stack {
__u64 nr;
__u64 hw_idx;
struct perf_branch_entry entries[];
};
On x86 platform
#define MAX_LBR_ENTRIES 32
struct cpu_hw_events {
....
struct perf_branch_stack lbr_stack;
struct perf_branch_entry lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
....
}
On powerpc platform
#define BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES 32
struct cpu_hw_events {
....
struct perf_branch_stack bhrb_stack;
struct perf_branch_entry bhrb_entries[BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES];
....
}
Followed same format on arm64 platform as well
#define BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES 64
struct pmu_hw_events {
....
....
struct perf_branch_stack brbe_stack;
struct perf_branch_entry brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
....
....
}
> probably do with being called out if it's the case. It feels
Right, we could add a comment in this regard.
> like it would be clearer and safer to allocate these dynamically
> when BRBE is used if that's possible, I'd expect that should also
> deal with the stack frame size issues as well.
That might not be possible because the generic 'struct perf_branch_stack'
expects 'perf_branch_stack.entries' to be a variable array which is also
contiguous in memory, with other elements in 'perf_branch_stack'. Besides
that will be a deviation from similar implementations on x86 and powerpc
platforms.
The stack frame size came up because BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES is 64 compared to
just 32 on other platforms, which follow the exact same method.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-13 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 5:10 [PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] arm64/perf: Add register definitions for BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-12 9:57 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-13 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 11:30 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] arm64/perf: Update struct arm_pmu " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 12:32 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-09 3:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 14:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-09 3:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-12 10:12 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-13 5:33 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2022-09-13 11:43 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-14 3:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-14 9:35 ` Mark Brown
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] driver/perf/arm_pmu_platform: Add support for BRBE attributes detection Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/perf: Drive BRBE from perf event states Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:31 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 9:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-08 10:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 10:39 ` James Clark
2022-09-13 11:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 5:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 10:55 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] " James Clark
2022-09-13 12:12 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 13:12 ` James Clark
2022-09-14 4:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84683aa7-58ad-85f8-327b-daed2f704834@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®