mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:03:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84683aa7-58ad-85f8-327b-daed2f704834@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yx8GBq1FJN49iJs9@sirena.org.uk>



On 9/12/22 15:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:40:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
>> +	/* Captured BRBE buffer - copied as is into perf_sample_data */
>> +	struct perf_branch_stack	brbe_stack;
>> +	struct perf_branch_entry	brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
> 
> It looks like perf_branch_entry is intended to be the variably
> sized entries array at the end of perf_branch_stack?  That could

That is right. Because max number of entries for brbe_entries[] array
is platform dependent i.e BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES on powerpc, MAX_LBR_ENTRIES
on x86 and BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES on arm64.

The generic definition

struct perf_branch_stack {
        __u64                           nr;
        __u64                           hw_idx;
        struct perf_branch_entry        entries[];
};

On x86 platform

#define MAX_LBR_ENTRIES         32

struct cpu_hw_events {
	....
	struct perf_branch_stack        lbr_stack;
        struct perf_branch_entry        lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
	....
}

On powerpc platform

#define BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES        32

struct cpu_hw_events {
	....
        struct  perf_branch_stack       bhrb_stack;
        struct  perf_branch_entry       bhrb_entries[BHRB_MAX_ENTRIES];
	....
}

Followed same format on arm64 platform as well

#define BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES	64

struct pmu_hw_events {
	....
	....
	struct perf_branch_stack	brbe_stack;
	struct perf_branch_entry	brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];
	....
	....
}

> probably do with being called out if it's the case.  It feels

Right, we could add a comment in this regard.

> like it would be clearer and safer to allocate these dynamically
> when BRBE is used if that's possible, I'd expect that should also
> deal with the stack frame size issues as well.

That might not be possible because the generic 'struct perf_branch_stack'
expects 'perf_branch_stack.entries' to be a variable array which is also
contiguous in memory, with other elements in 'perf_branch_stack'. Besides
that will be a deviation from similar implementations on x86 and powerpc
platforms.

The stack frame size came up because BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES is 64 compared to
just 32 on other platforms, which follow the exact same method.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-13  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08  5:10 [PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] arm64/perf: Add register definitions for BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-12  9:57   ` Mark Brown
2022-09-13  6:24     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 11:30       ` Mark Brown
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] arm64/perf: Update struct arm_pmu " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 12:32   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-09  3:11     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 14:14   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-09  3:14     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-12 10:12   ` Mark Brown
2022-09-13  5:33     ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2022-09-13 11:43       ` Mark Brown
2022-09-14  3:39         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-14  9:35           ` Mark Brown
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] driver/perf/arm_pmu_platform: Add support for BRBE attributes detection Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/perf: Drive BRBE from perf event states Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:31   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] arm64/perf: Add BRBE driver Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08  9:23   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-08 10:16     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 10:39   ` James Clark
2022-09-13 11:38     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08  5:10 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 10:55 ` [PATCH V2 0/7] " James Clark
2022-09-13 12:12   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-13 13:12     ` James Clark
2022-09-14  4:43       ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84683aa7-58ad-85f8-327b-daed2f704834@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®