From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Vyacheslav Mitrofanov
<Vyacheslav.Mitrofanov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: stmmac: Problem with adding the native GPIOs support
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:52:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8477f6be-eb8d-6b6f-33f2-835819542045@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214092516.lmbezb6hrbda6hzo@mobilestation>
Hi Serge,
Sorry I never used GPIO provided by DWMAC IP. Obviously, I think is to
late for you to use GPIOs provided by your SoC directly. Unfortunately,
it seems to be a "perfect" chicken and eggs problem :(.
Do you have possibilty to "play" with gpio setting. I mean change
configuration of them (at least for reset one) before perform a DMA
reset: If you have a pull-up on RST line and you could "disconnect" GPO
inside GMAC then your PHY should remain on during DMA reset phase.
regards
Alex
On 12/14/20 10:25 AM, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've got a problem, which has been blowing by head up for more than three
> weeks now, and I'm desperately need your help in that matter. See our
> Baikal-T1 SoC is created with two DW GMAC v3.73a IP-cores. Each core
> has been synthesized with two GPIOs: one as GPI and another as GPO. There
> are multiple Baikal-T1-based devices have been created so far with active
> GMAC interface usage and each of them has been designed like this:
>
> +------------------------+
> | Baikal-T1 +------------+ +------------+
> | SoC | DW GMAC | | Some PHY |
> | | Rx-clk+<------+Rx-clk |
> | | | | |
> | | GPI+<------+#IRQ |
> | | | | |
> | | RGMII+<----->+RGMII |
> | | MDIO+<----->+MDIO |
> | | | | |
> | | GPO+------>+#RST |
> | | | | |
> | | Tx-clk+------>+Tx-clk |
> | | | | |
> | +------------+ +------------+
> +------------------------+
>
> Each of such devices has got en external RGMII-PHY attached configured via the
> MDIO bus with Rx-clock supplied by the PHY and Tx-clock consumed by it. The
> main peculiarity of such configuration is that the DW GMAC GPIOs have been used
> to catch the PHY IRQs and to reset the PHY. Seeing the GPIOs support hasn't
> been added to the STMMAC driver it's the very first setup for now, which has
> been using them. Anyway the hardware setup depicted above doesn't seem
> problematic at the first glance, but in fact it is. See, the DW *MAC driver
> (STMMAC ethernet driver) is doing the MAC reset each time it performs the
> device open or resume by means of the call-chain:
>
> stmmac_open()---+
> +->stmmac_hw_setup()->stmmac_init_dma_engine()->stmmac_reset().
> stmmac_resume()-+
>
> Such reset causes the whole interface reset: MAC, DMA and, what is more
> important, GPIOs as being exposed as part of the MAC registers. That
> in our case automatically causes the external PHY reset, what neither
> the STTMAC driver nor the PHY subsystem expect at all.
>
> Moreover the stmmac_reset() method polls the DMA_BUS_MODE.SFT_RESET flag
> state to be sure the MAC is successfully completed. But since the external
> PHY has got in reset state it doesn't generate the Rx-clk signal. Due to
> that the MAC-DMA won't get out of the reset state so the stmmac_reset()
> method will return timeout error. Of course I could manually restore the
> GPIOs state in the stmmac_reset() before start to poll the SFT_RESET flag,
> which may release the PHY reset. But that seems more like a workaround,
> because the PHY still has been in reset and need to be reinitialized
> anyway. Moreover some PHY may need to have more complicated reset cycle
> with certain delays between RST assertion/de-assertion, so the workaround
> won't work well for them.
>
> To sum it up my question is what is the right way to resolve the problem
> described above? My first idea was to just move the MAC reset from the
> net-device open()/close() callbacks to the
> stmmac_dvr_probe()/stmmac_dvr_remove() functions and don't reset the whole
> interface on each device open. The problems we may have in that case is
> due to the suspend/resume procedures, which for some reason require the
> MAC reset too. That's why I need your help in this matter. Do you have any
> idea how to gently add the GPIOs support and don't break the STMMAC
> driver?
>
> One more tiny question regarding the DW *MAC drivers available in kernel.
> Aside of the DW GMAC Baikal-T1 SoC has also got DW xGMAC v2.11a embedded
> with XPCS PHY attached. My question is what driver should we better use to
> handle our xGMAC interface? AFAICS there are three DW *MAC-related drivers
> the kernel currently provides:
> 1) drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac
> 2) drivers/net/ethernet/amd/
> 3) drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/
> xGBE interface is supported by the drivers 1) and 2). In accordance with
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg414148.html all xGMAC related
> parts should have been added to 2), but recently the XGMAC support has
> been added to 1). So I am confused what driver is now supposed to be used
> for new xGMACs?
>
> Regards,
> -Sergey
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 9:25 Serge Semin
2020-12-14 10:52 ` Alexandre Torgue [this message]
2020-12-15 8:10 ` Serge Semin
2020-12-14 15:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-15 8:25 ` Serge Semin
2020-12-15 13:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-15 14:52 ` Serge Semin
2020-12-16 2:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-16 5:31 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8477f6be-eb8d-6b6f-33f2-835819542045@st.com \
--to=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Vyacheslav.Mitrofanov@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®