mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	matt@bobrowski.net, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, mason@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Verify tracing link_create logs
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 23:34:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8497ba87-354a-4564-a9cc-d376847e6b19@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11d1648e59b112236d1add138094b2c057d19270ba45e0fc47f6342da665db95@mail.kernel.org>

On 2026/11/9 22:47, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> selftests/bpf: Verify tracing link_create logs
> 
> TL;DR: Test issue: the invalid attach_type subtest in tracing_link.c may fail
> earlier in the generic check, so it may not exercise the new tracing log.
> Using BPF_TRACE_FEXIT on the fentry program might fix it.
> 
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_link.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_link.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +static void test_log_invalid_attach_type(void)
>> +{
>> +	const char *msg = "Invalid attach_type.\n";
>> +
>> +	test_fentry_link_create_log(0, 0, 0, BPF_XDP, false, msg);
>> +}
> 
> Does this subtest reach the tracing-specific log added by "bpf: Add log
> support for tracing link_create"?
> 
> With BPF_XDP on the fentry program, link_create() fails earlier in the
> generic check:
> 
>     ret = bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(prog, attr->link_create.attach_type);
>     if (ret) {
>         bpf_log(log, "Invalid attach_type.\n");
>         goto out;
>     }
> 
> For BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, attach_type_to_prog_type(BPF_XDP) returns
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, so bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type() returns -EINVAL
> and the case below is never reached:
> 
>     case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
>         if (attr->link_create.attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
>             bpf_log(log, "Invalid attach_type.\n");
> 
> Both messages are identical, so this subtest would still pass if the
> tracing-branch bpf_log() were removed.  The generic check is already
> covered by the invalid_attach_type subtest in xdp_link.c.
> 
> Would passing an attach type that maps to BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING but
> differs from the program's expected_attach_type, for example
> BPF_TRACE_FEXIT for this fentry program, exercise the new log instead?
> 

Agreed.

Will change the log msg to "Invalid tracing attach_type.\n", and change
BPF_XDP to BPF_TRACE_FEXIT.

Thanks,
Leon


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09 14:08 [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Add log support for tracing link_create Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/9] " Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-11 15:31     ` Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Add log support for tracing_multi link_create Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Add log support for iter link_create Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Add log support for cgroup prog link_create Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-11 15:32     ` Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] libbpf: Add log_opts support for BPF_TRACE_ITER Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-11 15:32     ` Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] selftests/bpf: Verify tracing link_create logs Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-11 15:34     ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Verify tracing_multi " Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Verify iter " Leon Hwang
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Verify cgroup prog " Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8497ba87-354a-4564-a9cc-d376847e6b19@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=matt@bobrowski.net \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®