From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: Kalpesh Solanki <skalpesh942@gmail.com>, pkshih@realtek.com
Cc: kvalo@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] wifi: rtw88: ps: trigger firmware recovery only after consecutive LPS leave failures on PCI
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 08:13:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84AB3D74-F70D-452F-B621-B5487951B719@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108142708.489067-4-skalpesh942@gmail.com>
Hi Kalpesh,
Thanks for the new version. Two comments below.
On November 8, 2026 3:27:07 PM GMT+01:00, Kalpesh Solanki
<skalpesh942@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
> index a74f199a93ab..7009f8ae3e57 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c > @@ -638,6 +638,9 @@ static void rtw_reset_vif_iter(void *data, u8 *mac, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
>
> void rtw_fw_recovery(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
> {
> + if (rtw_hci_type(rtwdev) != RTW_HCI_TYPE_PCIE)
> + return;
> +
The same check is also in rtw_fw_leave_lps_check() below, and the other
callers of rtw_fw_recovery() are PCI only, so I think this one can go.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/ps.c
> index add5a20b8432..fa3a4e476cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/ps.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/ps.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,13 @@ static void rtw_fw_leave_lps_check(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
> rtw_write32_clr(rtwdev, REG_TCR, BIT_PWRMGT_HWDATA_EN);
> rtw_warn(rtwdev, "firmware failed to leave lps state\n");
> rtw_fw_dump_dbg_info(rtwdev);
> +
> + rtwdev->ps_hang_cnt++;
> + if (rtw_hci_type(rtwdev) == RTW_HCI_TYPE_PCIE &&
> + rtwdev->ps_hang_cnt >= RTW_PS_HANG_MAX_CNT)
> + rtw_fw_recovery(rtwdev);
> + } else {
> + rtwdev->ps_hang_cnt = 0;
> }
As far as I can see this can't reach the limit on stuck firmware without
FW_FEATURE_LPS_C2H, which seems to include rtw8822b and rtw8723d. The
register check passes once the bit is clear, the failure path above
clears it, and I can only see the firmware setting it again when it
enters LPS.
So if I read it right, stuck firmware gives one failure, then the next
check passes and resets the counter, as long as the registers still read
fine. Three in a row would need firmware that is still running.
Would it make sense to only count failures when FW_FEATURE_LPS_C2H is set?
Ping-Ke, do you know if only the firmware sets this bit?
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 14:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] wifi: rtw88: firmware recovery fixes and LPS hang handling Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-08 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] wifi: rtw88: clear RTW_FLAG_RESTARTING on stop and start failure Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-09 7:05 ` Luka Gejak
2026-11-08 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] wifi: rtw88: skip already reset station in rtw_sta_remove() Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-09 7:11 ` Luka Gejak
2026-11-08 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] wifi: rtw88: ps: trigger firmware recovery only after consecutive LPS leave failures on PCI Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-09 7:13 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84AB3D74-F70D-452F-B621-B5487951B719@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=skalpesh942@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®