From: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenyi.qiang@intel.com,
shannon.zhao@linux.alibaba.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
hao.xiang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Check if bus lock vmexit was preempted
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:59:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84cd2713-3cc4-3120-946e-0cf8b8a8187d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0d6bcd8-11e4-4efd-0317-0bec6e59f06a@redhat.com>
On 2021/9/22 20:40, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/09/21 12:32, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>>
>>
>> EXIT_REASON.bus_lock_detected may or may not be set when exit reason
>> == EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK. Intel will update ISE or SDM to state it.
>>
>> Maybe we can do below in handle_bus_lock_vmexit handler:
>>
>> if (!to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected)
>> to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected = 1;
>>
>> But is manually changing the hardware reported value for software
>> purpose a good thing?
>
> No. That said, Hao's patch is just making the code clearer; there's
> no behavioral change since the "if" will just redo the same
> assignments as handle_bus_lock_vmexit.
>
> Paolo
I agree Paolo. EXIT_REASON.bus_lock_detected may or may not be set when
exit_reason=EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK, It clould depend on hardware
implementaion. No matter when intel states it clearly, I think it is
better that we avoid repeated assignment by adding additional check
condition in vmx_handle_exit. Of course , it is also ok that
hand_bus_lock_vmexit do nothing , but the code is not clear, and the
code logic will be inconsistent with spec description.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-18 11:30 Hao Xiang
2021-09-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-22 10:32 ` Xiaoyao Li
2021-09-22 12:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-23 0:59 ` Hao Xiang [this message]
2021-09-23 6:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-22 14:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-23 7:15 ` Hao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84cd2713-3cc4-3120-946e-0cf8b8a8187d@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hao.xiang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®