From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Akram Boulahia <akram02st@gmail.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Don't fail active mode init on read-only auto_sel
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:12:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <851316da-2cfa-4a22-947c-1838532d05cf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008040705.10600-1-akram02st@gmail.com>
On 10/7/26 23:07, Akram Boulahia wrote:
> Since commit 9dfd13f80c85 ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Toggle auto_sel in active
> mode on shared memory systems"), shmem_init_perf() no longer returns
> early in active mode and always calls cppc_set_auto_sel(), which was
> needed for shared memory systems. However, on firmware where the
> Autonomous Selection Enable entry of _CPC is a constant integer rather
> than a register, that write fails with -EOPNOTSUPP. The error is
> returned, every CPU fails to initialize, cpufreq_register_driver() finds
> no policy and returns -ENODEV, and the kernel falls back to
> acpi-cpufreq:
>
> amd_pstate: failed to set auto_sel, ret: -95
> amd_pstate: Failed to initialize CPU 0: -95
> ...
> amd_pstate: failed to register with return -19
>
> This was seen on an ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 (GA403UV, Ryzen 9 8945HS, BIOS
> 308). Its _CPC tables are revision 3 with the entry fixed at 1, and
> cppc_get_auto_sel() reads back 1 on all CPUs.
>
> If the write returns -EOPNOTSUPP while active mode is requested and
> auto_sel already reads as enabled, which is what active mode needs, the
> refused write is harmless and initialization can continue. Any other
> failure, including a refusal where the current value does not match the
> requested mode, is still returned as before.
>
> With this change, amd-pstate-epp loads on all 16 CPUs of that machine
> without warnings. amd_pstate=passive behaves as before: it still falls
> back to acpi-cpufreq with the same -95 errors, because auto_sel stays at 1
> and cannot be changed.
>
> Tested on Linux 7.3.0-rc6-00037-g7b63ef2d55f2.
>
> Fixes: 9dfd13f80c85 ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Toggle auto_sel in active mode on shared memory systems")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
> Signed-off-by: Akram Boulahia <akram02st@gmail.com>
> ---
You're in a really weird path if you have an 8945HS that is using shared
memory. That system has MSR access.
IE this sounds like a severe BIOS bug. Let's see what happens after you
update BIOS. If it's still failing please share an acpidump somewhere
(like a kernel bugzilla).
Need to make sure we understand why your system is behaving this way
before making code changes.
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 8bfd46d60843..05b496946d13 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ static int shmem_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> union perf_cached perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf);
> u64 numerator;
> bool auto_sel;
> + bool want;
>
> int ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpudata->cpu, &cppc_perf);
> if (ret)
> @@ -518,14 +519,23 @@ static int shmem_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->perf, perf);
> WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, cppc_perf.highest_perf);
>
> + want = (cppc_state != AMD_PSTATE_PASSIVE);
> +
> ret = cppc_get_auto_sel(cpudata->cpu, &auto_sel);
> if (ret) {
> pr_warn("failed to get auto_sel, ret: %d\n", ret);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = cppc_set_auto_sel(cpudata->cpu,
> - (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_PASSIVE) ? 0 : 1);
> + ret = cppc_set_auto_sel(cpudata->cpu, want);
> +
> + /*
> + * Firmware may expose Autonomous Selection Enable as a read-only
> + * constant. If it already matches what active mode needs, the
> + * failed write is harmless.
> + */
> + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP && want && auto_sel)
> + return 0;
>
> if (ret)
> pr_warn("failed to set auto_sel, ret: %d\n", ret);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 4:07 Akram Boulahia
2026-10-08 21:12 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-10-09 0:10 ` Akram Boulahia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=851316da-2cfa-4a22-947c-1838532d05cf@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=akram02st@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®