From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:10:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8515c858-4be8-fbd6-7868-c8bfb5492f83@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230922235446.260966-1-bhe@redhat.com>
On 9/22/23 18:54, Baoquan He wrote:
> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> failed easily when many momery hotplug event are notified in a short period.
> They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
>
> =======
> [ 78.714569] Fallback order for Node 0: 0
> [ 78.714575] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 1817886
> [ 78.717133] Policy zone: Normal
> [ 78.724423] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 78.727207] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 80.056643] PEFILE: Unsigned PE binary
> =======
>
> The memory hotplug events are notified very quickly and very many,
> while the handling of crash hotplug is much slower relatively. So the
> atomic variable __kexec_lock and kexec_trylock() can't guarantee the
> serialization of crash hotplug handling.
>
> Here, add a new mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock to serialize crash
> hotplug handling specifically. This doesn't impact the usage of
> __kexec_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/crash_core.c | 3 +++
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 1 +
> kernel/kexec_internal.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 03a7932cde0a..e8851724a530 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -783,9 +783,11 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct kimage *image;
>
> + crash_hotplug_lock();
> /* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
> if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
> + crash_hotplug_unlock();
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -852,6 +854,7 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
> out:
> /* Release lock now that update complete */
> kexec_unlock();
> + crash_hotplug_unlock();
> }
>
The crash_check_update_elfcorehdr() also has kexec_trylock() and needs similar treatment.
> static int crash_memhp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *v)
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> index 9dc728982d79..b95a73f35d9a 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> #include "kexec_internal.h"
>
> atomic_t __kexec_lock = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(__crash_hotplug_lock);
>
> /* Flag to indicate we are going to kexec a new kernel */
> bool kexec_in_progress = false;
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_internal.h b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> index 74da1409cd14..1db31625ef20 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ static inline void kexec_unlock(void)
> atomic_set_release(&__kexec_lock, 0);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Different than kexec/kdump loading/unloading/crash or kexec jumping/shrinking
> + * which usually rarely happen, there will be many crash hotplug events notified
> + * during one short period, e.g one memory board is hot added and memory regions
> + * are online. So mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock is used to serialize the crash
> + * hotplug handling specificially.
> + * */
> +extern struct mutex __crash_hotplug_lock;
> +#define crash_hotplug_lock() mutex_lock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +#define crash_hotplug_unlock() mutex_unlock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
> #include <linux/purgatory.h>
> void kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
The new content for kexec_internal.h and kexec_core.c could/should probably be
moved into crash_core.c, within the CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG?
eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-23 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 23:54 Baoquan He
2023-09-23 12:10 ` Eric DeVolder [this message]
2023-09-25 2:34 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8515c858-4be8-fbd6-7868-c8bfb5492f83@oracle.com \
--to=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®