From: "huang ying" <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: fixes some bugs about EFI memory map handling
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:58:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <851fc09e0801250558g2d7f50akf1b7ad1f58bcf970@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080125095016.GI23708@elte.hu>
On Jan 25, 2008 5:50 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch fixes some bugs of EFI memory handing code.
> > > >
> > > > - On x86_64, it is possible that EFI memory map can not be mapped via
> > > > identity map, so efi_map_memmap is removed, just use early_ioremap.
> > > >
> > > > - On i386, the EFI memory map mapping take effect cross paging_init,
> > > > so it is not necessary to use efi_map_memmap.
> > > >
> > > > - EFI memory map is unmapped in efi_enter_virtual_mode to avoid
> > > > early_ioremap leak.
> > >
> > > thanks, applied.
> > >
> > > btw., it would be nice to consolidate this some more. Why is there a
> > > separate efi_ioremap(), which is mapped to ioremap() on 32-bit, and
> > > which is mapped to a fixmap based special mapper on 64-bit?
> > >
> > > To me it appears this wants to be ioremap() on both 64-bit and
> > > 32-bit, and we could remove efi_ioremap() altogether. Hm?
> >
> > To support kexec, I want to map the EFI memory area on same virtual
> > address on different boot of different version of kernel. Then, the
> > EFI runtime service will always get the same execution environment.
> > This is because a weakness of EFI runtime service, it can not reset
> > its execution environment, except reboot.
>
> so this basically means that on 32-bit kexec wont work right - i.e. only
> 64-bit has been enhanced this way? What am i missing?
Strictly, I should say on 32-bit, EFI runtime service won't work in
kexeced kernel. That is, on EFI 32 platform, it is possible that:
- Boot kernel A with EFI runtime service
- kexec kernel B without EFI runtime service (such as with noefi in
kernel command line)
I suspect this method can be used on 32-bit platform. Because the
fixmap area on 32-bit is more limited than 64-bit. And because
identity map area on 32-bit is too limited, it is possible that all
EFI runtime code, data, IO areas need to be mapped via fixmap.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 5:55 Huang, Ying
2008-01-25 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 9:40 ` Huang, Ying
2008-01-25 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 13:58 ` huang ying [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=851fc09e0801250558g2d7f50akf1b7ad1f58bcf970@mail.gmail.com \
--to=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®