From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.110 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794515637; b=0obvbJ77WbFzjXBHI8l3OM4Aqt92VgmblNuOvSD91TtnWLJ9Pn3wW2LvdZf3b1ycm2GQ hTWFcyEUFCqHdiAppPAEMf8CFNprXpAZnfocqregi1VrLrgHoGq81ZjhP2NNL5kLv9hix WAFomMmPfpuCaKOteO5n4zSSoMSidNSzeT6KFJgaD7lv8N4wltoYHgTqjzKtxMNLh7IH/ /KBKtAqKMMcyUe+fiYdVv1BsOt1XSeVX0tLIks6s++0s2ffVnVCAt3A31etRAZGAElOWo ESiP7z5lJHcpChpibhtyxLbEaneD4lBc2wgfd4MBVHEdJbyvdsbKjeeXFnUQAFIZM6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794515637; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Correlation-ID; bh=wuC1euEpB0n5/EBJ0eB8N2MJRd4q5uJE1QtrwCLt46w=; b=i+65ZDbRew+gCzZ/oQOm/mDLoIsWN0SThwYAGABi3fbDmeAs1LixTrh+x2gLstkB3r2c vYxmkhRo+FriKU3WwNgQOUCxB2C6KKkydngpUo/J6UoaOcQC/TF+MSkN/SRICFCPFsIBi KRg9qxZDdC2JLreqXg3cYMGrfXxZmbbwlxtJK42vmPQuR+KhPfKc4TGZpV6DDNQKAg3Ed QcCp9Zg7o5wAJkPmbncgdDPigSp8jCu6ziMLDwUMXSXZzMhsYZUb3m9FzcUPN/iuYRwtD SU++55k1Tqx2nAwhMeoA4LyuimruE1xg07Ie7pvUIylT8nds8hDTkSJW+VgjJY9sl0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=h8YDMxEX; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.110 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-110.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.110]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC4E606A881 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 20:33:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 3CC4E606A881 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=h8YDMxEX X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=w4nr15arjCadyvhvYdzXDiaXF7mn7mX3vniCHDDp57o=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1794515634; v=1; x=1795120434; b=h8YDMxEXUmRrE9/nM31mwKslgk03iaxkFNY/bz0o8Z+5US3BaJbiC/v+wn4GmSMQRhiZfo7x BdIE5J4dg9+tNjN7/rmnMuUqsyMcpAtVcLy8riEkjjdcIkAgY4qTOHrcCwlCP6lqqZAANDrdx5F OLQcAI+7GKumZ+3+5usTv/2g= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 17f3d394bf4021e3; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 20:33:53 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 17f3d394bf4021e3 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 21:33:54 +0100 From: Denis Benato To: Andrei Rusu de Castro Cc: Corentin Chary , "Luke D. Jones" , Hans de Goede , =?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8523039e-ba83-48f3-aec4-6d9540b9d0fe@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20261112-asus-wmi-tpolicy-reply-f7889fb1@empyreal.works> References: <20261111-asus-wmi-tpolicy-5fbc4e09@empyreal.works> <20261112-asus-wmi-tpolicy-reply-f7889fb1@empyreal.works> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: write the thermal policy only when it changes X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <8523039e-ba83-48f3-aec4-6d9540b9d0fe@linux.dev> 12 nov 2026 21:27:45 Andrei Rusu de Castro : > On Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:32:21 +0100, Denis Benato wrote: >> I don't agree with this: if the userspace requests a power profile >> change the driver must honor that request. > > Hi Denis, > > Thanks for the review and the explanation, that makes sense. On my > machine the package power limits are set outside asus-armoury, so the > re-apply you suggest would not cover them, and I'll keep this change as > a local patch instead of pursuing it here. How are you applying limits? The only thing that comes to mind is intel rapl, but it has way lower limits than what asus validated. > > Thanks, > Andrei