From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC3AC38142 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229513AbjAQXQJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:16:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229566AbjAQXNq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:13:46 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FEF301AD for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:00:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1673989248; x=1705525248; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cqHJkJdGuPBVqZ0MII/dnJaUDPod5YB4Qm9m2ObDDQM=; b=HaPT6q4gOt7gUbXH3/bj/6RxiSNkF7rcQEMUTfn7SFkjC2mr8Gv99Wcb b/jF8MNE9HYrE4SHIiyKtjVX4x5es6zcX5Bfa86sjQpielx40iqA9IZP5 YgA85G/JvKdjZsI7PfomfXr76fEQUZZGXncMRSoG4v+qPLziCFbHuvKLj 0V6NACPFhClQ2U3TmtJJtDQ8VXqffpvyMm1fl9Brzbft8I9UA4T+UZkJe xJACuV5kerxoRjnwNXl1ZVd51R8orVw89338QNBbHEkZRkaQQctiYM3aF V9S6OhBt+aWxzIwklW3Ir/aSa8ukGJOL0HqSxqIHUR4s1RS5gFycCO+nr A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10593"; a="305191297" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,224,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="305191297" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2023 13:00:47 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10593"; a="988277039" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,224,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="988277039" Received: from youli-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.228.205]) ([10.255.228.205]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2023 13:00:46 -0800 Message-ID: <85249a7f-26a7-c20c-e5e5-5f85aaf611f6@intel.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:00:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/microcode/intel: Print when early microcode loading fails Content-Language: en-US To: Ashok Raj , Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , X86-kernel , LKML Mailing List , Tony Luck , Ingo Molnar , alison.schofield@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, Tom Lendacky References: <20230109153555.4986-1-ashok.raj@intel.com> <20230109153555.4986-7-ashok.raj@intel.com> <832b5c6c-cafa-e9e6-6e52-b741315d0865@intel.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/17/23 12:40, Ashok Raj wrote: > We just agreed to show both failed and success for late-load. Doing this is > consistent with that isn't it? Well, I kinda proposed that and you agreed. I don't think Boris ever agreed, though.