Re: [PATCH 5/6] platform/x86: ISST: Process read/write blocked feature status

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> When a feature is read blocked, don't continue to read SST information
> and register with SST core.
> 
> When the feature is write blocked, continue to offer read interface for
> SST parameters, but don't allow any operation to change state. A state
> change results from SST level change, feature change or class of service
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c    | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> index 0b6d2c864437..ed3a04d6c99c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> @@ -514,6 +516,9 @@ static long isst_if_clos_param(void __user *argp)
>  	if (!power_domain_info)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (power_domain_info->write_blocked)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +

I don't understand this, doesn't this now -EPERM both _write_cp_info() AND
_read_cp_info()??? Does _read_cp_info() also change state??

>  	if (clos_param.get_set) {
>  		_write_cp_info("clos.min_freq", clos_param.min_freq_mhz,
>  			       (SST_CLOS_CONFIG_0_OFFSET + clos_param.clos * SST_REG_SIZE),
> @@ -602,6 +607,9 @@ static long isst_if_clos_assoc(void __user *argp)
>  
>  		power_domain_info = &sst_inst->power_domain_info[punit_id];
>  
> +		if (power_domain_info->write_blocked)
> +			return -EPERM;

Same here, this blocks also the get path?


-- 
 i.