From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
To: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>, <song@kernel.org>,
<yukuai@fygo.io>, <xiao@kernel.org>, <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>,
<eadavis@sina.com>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] md: Fix the null-ptr-deref of 'mddev->private' while submitting IO
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:34:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <856a065c-38ef-08cd-7701-8f579212a1a3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2zexf3r84.fsf@gmail.com>
在 2026/9/18 16:20, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 15:38 +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
>> 在 2026/9/18 15:29, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi 写道:
>>>
>>> Hi Zhihao,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 15:09 +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
>>>> Concurrent processes md_stop and IO submitting could trigger a
>>>> null-ptr-deref of 'mddev->private':
>>>>
>>>> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000070
>>>> RIP: 0010:_wait_barrier+0x2f/0x250
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> raid1_make_request+0x150/0xf50
>>>> md_handle_request+0x104/0x530
>>>> md_submit_bio+0x76/0x130
>>>> submit_bio+0xdd/0x250
>>>> submit_bio_wait+0x1f/0x40
>>>> __blkdev_direct_IO_simple+0x1f6/0x370
>>>> blkdev_write_iter+0x3b2/0x520
>>>> ksys_write+0x7d/0x190
>>>>
>>>> P1
>>>> fd = open(/dev/md0, O_RDWR)
>>>> P2 (forked from P1, fd' <= fd)
>>>> write(fd)
>>>> submit_bio
>>>> md_handle_request
>>>> raid1_make_request
>>>> raid1_write_request
>>>> ioctl(fd, STOP_ARRAY)
>>>> mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev
>>>> // check passed, mddev->openers = 1,
>>>> // because md_open() is only called
>>>> // once in P1->open
>>>> do_md_stop
>>>> __md_stop
>>>> mddev->private = NULL
>>>>
>>>> conf = mddev->private // NULL
>>>> wait_barrier(conf, sector) // null-ptr-deref !
>>>>
>>>> It is a common problem for raid0/1/10/5, and __md_stop could be triggered
>>>> by several paths(eg. ioctl, sysfs, ->dtr). Fix it by replacing
>>>> mddev_lock() with mddev_suspend_and_lock() for all __md_stop() callers.
>>>> The caller dm_table_destroy() is guaranteed being invoked with device
>>>> suspended, so raid_dtr() could keep using mddev_lock_nointr().
>>>> The caller array_state_store() is guaranteed by the check
>>>> mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev(mddev, 0). For example, someone open
>>>> /dev/mdx, write something and close /dev/mdx, it won't trigger the
>>>> problem, all dirty pages can be flushed before mddev->openers decrement.
>>>> Besides, fail the submitting IO in md_handle_request() if the
>>>> 'mddev->pers' becomes NULL.
>>>>
>>>> Fetch a reproducer in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222020
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+3fe892ea5fc292e1353f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3fe892ea5fc292e1353f
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> 1. Add 'mddev->pers != NULL' check before make_request
>>>> 2. Delete dm-raid caller(->dtr) modifications
>>>> 3. Move memalloc_noio_restore after mddev_unlock_and_resume
>>>> v2->v3:
>>>> 1. Remove modifications in array_state_store()
>>>> 2. update commit msg
>>>> drivers/md/md.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> index 680b34a63cb3..e73338c26d53 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>>>> @@ -414,6 +414,20 @@ bool md_handle_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
>>>> if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&mddev->active_io))
>>>> goto check_suspended;
>>>> }
>>>> + if (!mddev->pers) {
>>> Isn't this case already handled by md_submit_bio(). take a look in
>>> md_submit_bio()
>> Hi,Abd-Alrhman
>> I understand that 'mddev == NULL || mddev->pers == NULL' in
>> md_submit_bio() is a qiuck check, there still exists a small race window:
>> P1 P2
>> md_submit_bio
>> if (mddev == NULL || mddev->pers == NULL)
>> md_ioctl
>> mddev_suspend_and_lock
>> do_md_stop->__md_stop
>> // set mddev->pers/private as NULL
>> mddev_unlock_and_resume
>> md_handle_request
>> if (is_suspended(mddev, bio))
>> percpu_ref_tryget_live(&mddev->active_io)
>> mddev->pers // null-ptr-deref
>
> It makes sense. It would solve only the null pointer reference, but I
> see another issue. Look at the comment before calling
> mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev() in md_ioctl(). it says "Need to
> flush page cache, and ensure no-one else opens and writes". The
> suspending happens after flushing the page cache, in this case,
> there might be other writes in-flight.
At present, the current implementation does not align with the expected
annotations. Yu Kai privately gave me a feasible suggestion, which is to
have md_ioctl operate on a character device(like /dev/mapper/control)
instead of an md block device. This fix patch will serve as a temporary
solution before the official implementation is merged. By the way, I
don't have much time to implment it, do you have time to deal with the
official solution?
>
>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The __md_stop() sets 'mddev->private' to NULL during
>>>> + * the IO submitting, check 'mddev->pers' before the IO
>>>> + * being processed by specific driver to avoid the
>>>> + * null-ptr-deref of 'mddev-><member>'. The check is
>>>> + * safe because the IO has got the 'mddev->active_io'
>>>> + * reference, and all __md_stop() callers will wait for
>>>> + * the reference to be zero.
>>>> + */
>>>> + bio_io_error(bio);
>>>> + percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
>>>> + return true;
>>>> + }
>>>> if (!mddev->pers->make_request(mddev, bio)) {
>>>> percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
>>>> if (mddev_is_dm(mddev) && mddev->pers->prepare_suspend)
>>>> @@ -8299,6 +8313,7 @@ static bool md_ioctl_need_suspend(unsigned int cmd)
>>>> case HOT_REMOVE_DISK:
>>>> case SET_BITMAP_FILE:
>>>> case SET_ARRAY_INFO:
>>>> + case STOP_ARRAY:
>>>> return true;
>>>> default:
>>>> return false;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.52.0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 7:09 Zhihao Cheng
2026-09-18 7:29 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-09-18 7:38 ` Zhihao Cheng
2026-09-18 8:20 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-09-18 8:34 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2026-09-18 8:54 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-09-18 9:30 ` yu kuai
2026-09-18 9:41 ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=856a065c-38ef-08cd-7701-8f579212a1a3@huawei.com \
--to=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=abd.masalkhi@gmail.com \
--cc=eadavis@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiao@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®