From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751956AbeAZQ2g (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:28:36 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:64366 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751777AbeAZQ2K (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:28:10 -0500 Subject: Re: mfd: Patch management? To: Lee Jones , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , =?UTF-8?Q?Lars_P=c3=b6schel?= , Samuel Ortiz References: <9c50fe6a-21cc-e49d-1b10-5d2457ed4e2a@users.sourceforge.net> <20180123125851.ysypf7375sjlgsc6@dell> <20180123130130.powyttapsx3djawx@dell> <20180123151419.prwq62c7gpsnpbx3@dell> <20180123163130.h6ygmzig7syafxbh@dell> <49873902-c947-468d-094a-4ac175850116@users.sourceforge.net> <20180126114514.dwhwwgcp4n6fayre@dell> <20180126141255.7adgqjlonuvujp2x@dell> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <856e9b19-2e42-a6b2-85c4-c89a81b071f8@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:28:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180126141255.7adgqjlonuvujp2x@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qXkQjisXneRb29Kqnl5txV9KUh93atBHraQFE5VTFTrmV9AzrFL cyKFJWt+M2din4R0tcZOg8wLRO5eb6RvxTzH634CNaLm7AP+5KhAfXJ4qbikiX1OxswbHQu XxM2Jqf2BmerJKQEYsEcKIHDYHSTeWKCNoU+HG0YIBbZrn5jKbtsf80ox6h8fsjNOIBtUE/ lkw09uQTP5Hf+aE6Wyjxw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:rK+N0FaAiIo=:45lJ8TGvs90FX3zjivNAPg rBNipVdvbl+4se2HJIMF95AXidpxLfIyNT/4QiGL4SKCwI+XP3taoTIJbaEe9YZp5+FCrH/H4 UFtKNBHlowR0Jr9hSQzvPX4O4baG5OVcoqUnGTNnqniQjB1F72dyfv+EW1QmypEf1bvFgFpKS NsBplWoI6xvf1gFl9hniIcZmNVX2qUjkhOxw4OTPSPDg6FRou7P+yyq+PPJ79q1QROj9rvNTi IA21NtOCYvyG64xsba8T4ApOdu7C2ChGQrppUaX5XhiYItPCLTTIQI6BBuY7HKK7sIFdryVAC lFl+Tq/esdRt0F7KpMXeocJnhacPvCgU2qF08O0v1nxi1R3n1N9GxHNF9V4EcVIbSCQDs3JG2 WWonqi0m69Z9CseKXIYZtDj5Xb4jlMri6QJeNkiEvGb2JgJIldSsFxAO6fk8HOuZK91rpWxi1 FIeARYvl/wlfcDI8Vg4aXvFFdFzZbRaqPwKnWbcGbzN/44fyR7Ge10zf6tvvdpvJA3eS1f/QW Es+87fcfVHD5kY2xjoCHb8b9qI0ydkLUvQgailoANC/PtTzYJ3dhTxtLcPq5TsLuaY2er61uE Kb7TkweBA2eDoyHGHtnoOEg+vhNavx3lCTos9jEgy9tbtPfxDdsD77RP3eLJThoPiwD6vrSGv JkSmiXA+dOO/8Ba0+MsTprG3xnvonqrUh68DN9sxGtFOXV+fYa6H43VALtuZyTRoLtvHGCM/u +gL2UF3QwKTyp5UgLpsY6/yhtYizKkgHHwvdEEUsk5Os5FFDYQ5mFD/kQsSY+KUvkD56Qtxsp y2JKNix Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> I am curious if more positive feedback could evolve till then. >> I would appreciate if a potentially needed resend for my selection >> of update suggestions could become smaller (when reviewed steps >> could be already integrated for example). > > I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say, > in any of your responses. I imagine that acceptance for these changes could be influenced also by review comments from other contributors. > Are you using Google Translate to convert between your > first language and English? No. > If you want to rebase your patches, to see what has been applied and > what hasn't, you can use the MFD repo and its next-next branch. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next-next How are the chances that further update suggestions will be integrated just because I sent them as small patch series in the threaded way? Examples: * tps65910: Adjustments for four function implementations https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/313 * abx500-core: Adjustments for eight function implementations https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/186 Regards, Markus