From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754059Ab3ILKp4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:45:56 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48961 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831Ab3ILKpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:45:54 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Stephen Warren , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:56:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8571427.B6ubx1als5@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.11.0+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <5076102.HGJgP9ualc@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 12, 2013 04:13:03 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12 September 2013 16:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Please resend. And I honestly don't think that [1-3/5] are fixes and > > [4/5] is not needed any more. > > Okay, I will resend 5/5.. I didn't get you last two statements clearly :( > - don't think that [1-3/5] are fixes: You meant they are cleanups rather? Yes. > Yes, and that's why I asked you to take those on for 3.13 and not for 12.. Ah, sorry, I must have overlooked that. I didn't say I wasn't going to take them, though. > - [4/5] is not needed any more: 4/5 is already applied by you and it came > from Rafael.. I reinvented the wheel, nothing more. And so it is not required > anymore :) Surely from Srivatsa? Thanks, Rafael