From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757707AbdKORSo (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:18:44 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53706 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757467AbdKORSf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:18:35 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 2EB34601CF Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=prsood@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock To: Tejun Heo , Peter Zijlstra Cc: longman@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, mingo@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <45cdac2f-4462-e5b5-d724-8cca58e3932a@codeaurora.org> <1509347805-23491-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org> <6f8b194f-05ec-05d4-3df6-e9eadc7f68bf@codeaurora.org> <20171115103742.xt7muaq2dfrs2cyd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171115170524.GU983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> From: Prateek Sood Message-ID: <857d3615-f1c6-c525-62cd-111ee5df6ac6@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:48:21 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171115170524.GU983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/2017 10:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote: >>> Any improvement/suggestion for this patch? >> >> I would have done 2 patches, the first one solving the locking issue, >> the second removing the then redundant async rebuild stuff. >> >> Other than that this looks OK I suppose, but I was expecting this to go >> through the cgroup tree, TJ? > > Will pick them up after -rc1. > > Thanks. > I have made two patches as suggested by Peter and sent for review. -- Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project