From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: "Wanpeng Li" <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Single target IPI fastpath
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:44:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <857e6494-4ed8-be4a-c21a-577ab99a5711@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114152235.GC24045@linux.intel.com>
On 14/11/19 16:22, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Instead of a separate vcpu->fast_vmexit, perhaps you can set exit_reason
>> to vmx->exit_reason to -1 if the fast path succeeds.
>
> Actually, rather than make this super special case, what about moving the
> handling into vmx_handle_exit_irqoff()? Practically speaking that would
> only add ~50 cycles (two VMREADs) relative to the code being run right
> after kvm_put_guest_xcr0(). It has the advantage of restoring the host's
> hardware breakpoints, preserving a semi-accurate last_guest_tsc, and
> running with vcpu->mode set back to OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE. Hopefully it'd
> also be more intuitive for people unfamiliar with the code.
Yes, that's a good idea. The expensive bit between handle_exit_irqoff
and handle_exit is srcu_read_lock, which has two memory barriers in it.
>>> + if (ret == 0)
>>> + ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>> Please move the "kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu)" to
>> vmx_handle_exit, so that this basically is
>>
>> #define EXIT_REASON_NEED_SKIP_EMULATED_INSN -1
>>
>> if (ret == 0)
>> vcpu->exit_reason = EXIT_REASON_NEED_SKIP_EMULATED_INSN;
>>
>> and handle_ipi_fastpath can return void.
>
> I'd rather we add a dedicated variable to say the exit has already been
> handled. Overloading exit_reason is bound to cause confusion, and that's
> probably a best case scenario.
I proposed the fake exit reason to avoid a ternary return code from
handle_ipi_fastpath (return to guest, return to userspace, call
kvm_x86_ops->handle_exit), which Wanpeng's patch was mishandling.
To ensure confusion does not become the best case scenario, perhaps it
is worth trying to push exit_reason into vcpu_enter_guest's stack.
vcpu_enter_guest can pass a pointer to it, and then it can be passed
back into kvm_x86_ops->handle_exit{,_irqoff}. It could be a struct too,
instead of just a bare u32.
This would ensure at compile-time that exit_reason is not accessed
outside the short path from vmexit to kvm_x86_ops->handle_exit.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-09 7:05 Wanpeng Li
2019-11-09 7:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: LAPIC: micro-optimize fixed mode ipi delivery Wanpeng Li
2019-11-11 21:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 1:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-10 1:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Single target IPI fastpath kbuild test robot
2019-11-10 1:59 ` [PATCH] KVM: X86: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2019-11-11 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: X86: Single target IPI fastpath Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-11-12 1:18 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-11 21:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 1:33 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-13 6:05 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-14 3:12 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-11-14 11:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-14 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-14 15:44 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-11-14 16:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-11-15 5:56 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=857e6494-4ed8-be4a-c21a-577ab99a5711@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®