From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, xiexiuqi@huawei.com,
huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangnan0@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf/trace : Fix repetitious traces of perf on tracepoint
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:33:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8597218.ZhpRet0H89@milian-kdab2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516106438-4143-1-git-send-email-cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3083 bytes --]
On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 1:40:38 PM CET Cheng Jian wrote:
> When i use perf to trace the sched_wakeup_new tracepoint, there is
> a bug that output the same event repetitiously.
> It can be reproduced by :
>
> #./test_fork
> parent pid : 1059
> child pid : 1060
> #perf record -e sched:sched_wakeup_new -p 1060
>
> test_fork is an demo that can generating wakeup_new event, parent
> process does nothing but fork a child process, and then they both
> quit.
>
> There are 4 processors in this machine. before this patch,
> perf script(perf-1058, parent-1059, child-1060) :
>
> test_fork 1059 [001] 62.913689: sched:sched_wakeup_new:
> comm=test_fork pid=1060 prio=120 target_cpu=002 test_fork 1059 [001]
> 62.913698: sched:sched_wakeup_new: comm=test_fork pid=1060 prio=120
> target_cpu=002 test_fork 1059 [001] 62.913705: sched:sched_wakeup_new:
> comm=test_fork pid=1060 prio=120 target_cpu=002
>
> but ftrace report this event only once :
>
> test_fork-1059 [002] d... 62.913680: sched_wakeup_new: comm=test_fork
> pid=1060 prio=120 target_cpu=002
>
> perf script print the same wakeup_new event multiple times.
>
> These events which trigger this issue all specify a target process.
> commit e6dab5ffab59 ("perf/trace: Add ability to set a target task
> for events") has designed a method to trace these events. For
> example, the sched_wakeup and sched_wakeup_new tracepoint will be
> caught when the current task wakeup a target task.
>
> These events are registered as per cpu most of the time and attached
> to the task too, we will get all of them from the perf_event_context
> of this task, they will be matched success but are all the same event.
> So check the cpu number of this event to avoid matching them multiple
> times.
>
> after this patch, perf script(parent-1040, child-1041):
>
> test_fork 1040 [002] 36.536079: sched:sched_wakeup_new: comm=test_fork
> pid=1041 prio=120 target_cpu=003
>
> It will match it only once for tracing task(child-1041).
Oh, this sounds awesome. I don't have the setup available to compile a kernel
with this patch applied, but I think from the description it solves a long-
standing issue with perf's sleep-time profiling.
Can someone try this please:
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial#Profiling_sleep_times
Use 'sleep 1' as the debuggee. On my system, I get the period multiplied by
nproc like you describe:
```
$ perf-sleep-record sleep 1
..
$ perf report --stdio --show-total-period | grep "Event count"
..
# Event count (approx.): 8000845488
$ nproc
8
```
The sleep-record script is available at: https://github.com/milianw/shell-helpers/blob/master/perf-sleep-record
I believe your patch also fixes the sched_stat_* tracepoints to be only
emitted once per CPU. Can you verify this? I.e. is the period finally
correctly calculated and we get a value of roughly 1E9ns == 1s?
Thanks
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3826 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 12:40 Cheng Jian
2018-01-16 14:33 ` Milian Wolff [this message]
2018-01-27 9:42 ` chengjian (D)
2018-01-16 15:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-17 13:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-17 14:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8597218.ZhpRet0H89@milian-kdab2 \
--to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cj.chengjian@huawei.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®