From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Don't immediately close events that are run on invalid CPU/sink combos
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:53:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <859c5009-a050-2832-7e1b-e88c5d2acd12@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff78b350-f899-0515-ef54-16a3e89ae9d2@arm.com>
On 22/09/2021 10:24, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 21/09/2021 14:02, James Clark wrote:
[...]
>> - event->hw.state = 0;
>> -
>> /* Finally enable the tracer */
>> if (source_ops(csdev)->enable(csdev, event, CS_MODE_PERF))
>> goto fail_disable_path;
>> +out:
>> + /* Tell the perf core the event is alive */
>> + event->hw.state = 0;
>> /* Save the event_data for this ETM */
>> ctxt->event_data = event_data;
>> -out:
>> return;
>
> Hi James,
>
> I think this problematic. The "out" label is reached from the "failed"
> path. So, we would reset the STOPPED state. I think we should simply
> return when we reach the "fail" label.
>
> Please could you resend this patch with the changes.
>
> Kind regards
> Suzuki
>
Oops yes I missed that, I've resubmitted. It probably would have just about
worked because from my testing it seems like the event isn't re-enabled
if perf_aux_output_end() is called from start regardless of the STOPPED/RUNNING
state.
Thanks
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 13:02 James Clark
2021-09-21 15:17 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-09-21 16:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-21 17:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-09-22 9:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-09-22 12:53 ` James Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=859c5009-a050-2832-7e1b-e88c5d2acd12@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®