mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Dave Young <ruirui.yang@linux.dev>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:49:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859d4e5f-c491-4a0d-a7ea-0a16159f8059@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828084900.1496839-4-coiby.xu@gmail.com>



On 28/08/26 14:18, Coiby Xu wrote:
> In case user adds/deletes the keys by mistake, it's safer to read the
> number of keys from reserved memory.
>
> Fixes: 9ebfa8dcaea7 ("crash_dump: reuse saved dm crypt keys for CPU/memory hot-plugging")
> Reported-and-Suggested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
> ---
>   kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> index 026c7de4ad85..0b9e09c60745 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> @@ -89,21 +89,31 @@ static int get_keys_from_kdump_reserved_memory(void)
>   {
>   	struct keys_header *keys_header_loaded;
>   	size_t keys_header_size;
> -
> -	keys_header_size = get_keys_header_size(key_count);
> -	keys_header = kzalloc(keys_header_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!keys_header)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	int r = 0;
>   
>   	arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres();
>   	keys_header_loaded = kmap_local_page(pfn_to_page(
>   		kexec_crash_image->dm_crypt_keys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>   
> +	if (keys_header_loaded->total_keys <= 0 ||
> +	    keys_header_loaded->total_keys > KEY_NUM_MAX) {
> +		pr_warn("keys_header saved to reserved memory may be corrupt\n");
> +		r = -EINVAL;
> +		goto kunmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	keys_header_size = get_keys_header_size(keys_header_loaded->total_keys);
> +	keys_header = kzalloc(keys_header_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!keys_header) {
> +		r = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto kunmap;
> +	}
> +
>   	memcpy(keys_header, keys_header_loaded, keys_header_size);
> +kunmap:
>   	kunmap_local(keys_header_loaded);
>   	arch_kexec_protect_crashkres();
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return r;
>   }
>   
>   static int restore_dm_crypt_keys_to_thread_keyring(void)
> @@ -447,12 +457,12 @@ int crash_load_dm_crypt_keys(struct kimage *image)
>   	mutex_lock(&config_keys_subsys.su_mutex);
>   	mutex_acquired = true;
>   
> -	if (key_count <= 0) {
> -		kexec_dprintk("No dm-crypt keys\n");
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>   	if (!is_dm_key_reused) {
> +		if (key_count <= 0) {
> +			kexec_dprintk("No dm-crypt keys\n");
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +

Not directly related to this patch, but I have a query.

Do we really need to take config_keys_subsys.su_mutex when keys are
reused? If not, how about moving the acquisition and release of
config_keys_subsys.su_mutex into build_keys_header()?


- Sourabh Jain
>   		r = build_keys_header();
>   		if (r)
>   			goto out;
> @@ -463,7 +473,7 @@ int crash_load_dm_crypt_keys(struct kimage *image)
>   	 * cleaned up at the end of kexec_file_load syscall
>   	 */
>   	kbuf.buffer = keys_header;
> -	kbuf.bufsz = get_keys_header_size(key_count);
> +	kbuf.bufsz = get_keys_header_size(keys_header->total_keys);
>   
>   	kbuf.memsz = kbuf.bufsz;
>   	kbuf.buf_align = ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260828084900.1496839-1-coiby.xu@gmail.com>
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] crash_dump: Fix potential double free and UAF of keys_header Coiby Xu
2026-08-30  6:30   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-30  7:07   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] crash_dump: Disallow writing to dm-crypt configfs during kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-29  7:02   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-29 12:17     ` Coiby Xu
2026-08-30  5:37       ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] crash_dump: Read the number of dm-crypt keys from reserved memory Coiby Xu
2026-08-30  7:19   ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] crash_dump: Free temporary dm-crypt keys_header buffer in kdump kernel Coiby Xu
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] crash_dump: Only use kexec_dprintk during the kexec_file_load syscall Coiby Xu
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] crash_dump: Improve readability of config_keys_restore_store Coiby Xu
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] crash_dump: Check the function return codes in restore_dm_crypt_keys_to_thread_keyring Coiby Xu
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] crash_dump: Disallow configfs/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse if crash hotplug supported Coiby Xu
2026-08-30  7:58   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-08-28  8:48 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] Documentation: kdump: Add arm64 and ppc64le to encrypted dump target support list Coiby Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=859d4e5f-c491-4a0d-a7ea-0a16159f8059@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®