From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5EB51E3772 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 15:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751902921; cv=none; b=DxSZRSqkzJ8w295IJ1Xhoxr9LVDepzxw5Bu4G//n8vIhP8MNILxk2WyWXdwm3XR8Xu86kk1BDrjE4BxfODcdGoHYqVJXUysSUtS6udtaqqiVSXmx2GdZaDLC+HfD5ow+5VqbnCf37hX9Vc+7vUIWrI/H3L4sDMMwoYKNLP0QgEw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751902921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nZcqKdsiNZsgXi3CYyuSuyLeDkIyPeUFTwLlGsfH+YU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ffeL/UE4+Pk13vdETd5OJg/4Lcm98QHrD0wNgaWBtqVC61GVLuPJ8k3RJxoLJ9KewCT+jkZVgvEuEUgJagrz0ahEajg9cZNULN6yfxNB3hjLpvtlCabPZDAKT+DYyoAFqH6w5rua5+9OS1hFR2qEoGPFJ1FNzYBs9pEEDSemu/4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=t-8ch.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=t-8ch.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=t-8ch.de header.i=@t-8ch.de header.b=HC6Zl+yD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=t-8ch.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=t-8ch.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=t-8ch.de header.i=@t-8ch.de header.b="HC6Zl+yD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=t-8ch.de; s=mail; t=1751902916; bh=nZcqKdsiNZsgXi3CYyuSuyLeDkIyPeUFTwLlGsfH+YU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HC6Zl+yDd0IraQCtoRPhJn/pNVxM+9OLUpLr6ZJ8eFa8mJg/zyO6DjHAuvKhSbMV7 GVXWHjtSmIwkHrDld+oxEG5N+W9VvInYzkQaj1QaK2hna1z0Pek027ULU2wSq/ML9X vbWKAwTy4izRAvL6qi8Kw+/6ZQRdYrw2eXNoSrAU= Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:41:56 +0200 From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] tools/nolibc: add a new "install_all_archs" target Message-ID: <85c93c7c-239c-47aa-8a4e-d944c828314b@t-8ch.de> References: <20250629170732.16817-1-w@1wt.eu> <20250629170732.16817-3-w@1wt.eu> <2363c2c9-a3ba-4b2b-849e-cd9e4d73297c@t-8ch.de> <20250706070124.GD29601@1wt.eu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250706070124.GD29601@1wt.eu> On 2025-07-06 09:01:24+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > If it is made clear that there is no interest in packaging uapi headers > for archs not supported by nolibc, then this means that nolibc can be > the place where the archs to be packaged is decided, and the two can > be more tightly coupled, but as of now, this lack of interest is not > yet obvious to me. Given that this functionality was removed from kbuild recently I assume that it there is limited interest to get it back. Also in v2 none of the kbuild maintainers or list are Cc-ed anymore. IMO we can apply patch 1 first and on its own. Thomas