From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F3A13D638; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758194083; cv=none; b=YOKKGYq4XIJI/Lxu/6MJLkbD9LrcYXDo5StAwGhB0dLmpK3VNZ9NGt52zMKuTf+rjlIjWXPOTtMPbd5RxUXTecDNfNhHQmrao6GXVJDG95C8d583TPuqaLcCsIjlkxnmYnNdcI67tBmOMSRZQ5So61M8bZTW8bUK2zhX61Uxlrg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758194083; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uqKLQL0kXPlTW24rRLvkA6f101bLzhi+v2aTGmvoekQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mtqZXiWqnApvkQxqoaBlj7aNbCjw2n5llxi5G3/yvQSc+IYSeR81OEjEp80e0YyS2XFG/PpqRxflB6OmF2zLcBGuSj+d3U13fojjmNz6f39qnmYf0/zI9TwFt0BMOOejeEjBSUP/w5ZaqppvrYxFlgUhfYPpLxINQbQpt7MGIO0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hY2y7E8o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hY2y7E8o" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 226F6C4CEE7; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:14:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758194083; bh=uqKLQL0kXPlTW24rRLvkA6f101bLzhi+v2aTGmvoekQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hY2y7E8oPFC4GuWcczzwCap37MRRFfXocXGwF5tfiob6nWiwEGmnk3ou8Ag/L2fOj WNZP/y4IpK8Hr6/BlKZ9obj6KneJTH6b5m2Ms5TdqTMtv6QQt5S8m7tNeIM9FjxH+F +xfQF7JOPk9XX5JZHhd+klKP5TiksKlVnn3bJnbEXMO+f4WZx97XuDpArSLa8tvB1O dXARWNioqFc4PiD54+ZR3jVUYPKlbknmjL4sbyDa7u8PcqA6xUnBpyz5TbBnBjvDeq DzGNAQqOi/yaQe5eobFR50ynsaNQ/Wzt4IWOyXQRcSvGSFkndiCumN2Jfsv7YC9g/z uGkOtT69qz3+w== Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:14:37 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Liam Girdwood , Herve Codina , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolin Chen , Shengjiu Wang , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Qiang Zhao , Fabio Estevam , Takashi Iwai , Xiubo Li , Jaroslav Kysela Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] ASoC: fsl: fsl_qmc_audio: Reduce amount of interrupts Message-ID: <85ea3256-dd31-47b1-8e2d-a9d207b28fa0@sirena.org.uk> References: <3d20d3ec-2f52-4cac-9c5c-fd2141a12a0b@csgroup.eu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1Rv2MdpZahqmMZwq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3d20d3ec-2f52-4cac-9c5c-fd2141a12a0b@csgroup.eu> X-Cookie: Victory uber allies! --1Rv2MdpZahqmMZwq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 08:12:21AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hi Mark, Liam, >=20 > Le 18/08/2025 =E0 10:19, Christophe Leroy a =E9crit=A0: > > This series reduces significantly the amount of interrupts on > > fsl_qmc_audio device. >=20 > I can't see this series in linux-next. >=20 > I see in patchwork [1] that this series still has status 'NEW' but also > state 'archived'. >=20 > What is the way forward to get it applied for v6.18 ? Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --1Rv2MdpZahqmMZwq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmjL6ZwACgkQJNaLcl1U h9D2swgAgTsZe6lJbstmvGT3sE8IM/SR5DbwYbMqquiSJfASLpWn6+IpQ9jey7dC rBQ/Kac/dqktoRic2n2MNciZbkk1DBkKn7U3giWJn+Lc2TEdF/2k3D8gIb0fTkOv pFy2ITzlJpnJe41HMTRLT0Y+2MmjTmLBp6H5mbExn9AJ5RtMcXxAMDfCB5pqSWQr nSzduldkPYgbVRrD+RbcTzbal6R/Rjkatm1QfAt5iy7K4cvZQmNIZEOrePIP/Mzm nt9+XFbYZHnCTxshgzhYuJBgsik6w211UWlWYuibWrlvWW/323RrN8l46amu67bJ Zkpxs4GJvx/WIEeyf0hmzc8A7/+Qqw== =xpzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1Rv2MdpZahqmMZwq--