From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6294CC4321E for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2183D20844 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2183D20844 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726735AbeIHBHo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 21:07:44 -0400 Received: from baldur.buserror.net ([165.227.176.147]:48620 "EHLO baldur.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726107AbeIHBHo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 21:07:44 -0400 Received: from [2601:449:8400:7293:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0] by baldur.buserror.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fyNJR-0007Sx-DR; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:25:06 -0500 Message-ID: <86101ce0f4201d05510e57d74cafe8c665b8e5d4.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Ran Wang , Leo Li , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:25:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180831035219.31619-3-ran.wang_1@nxp.com> References: <20180831035219.31619-1-ran.wang_1@nxp.com> <20180831035219.31619-3-ran.wang_1@nxp.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:449:8400:7293:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ran.wang_1@nxp.com, leoyang.li@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 11:52 +0800, Ran Wang wrote: > The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module (Run > Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level > tasks associated with power management such as wakeup source control. > > This driver depends on FSL platform PM driver framework which help to > isolate user and PM service provider (such as RCPM driver). > > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang > --- > drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c | 153 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c Is there a reason why this is LS-specific, or could it be used with PPC RCPM blocks? > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > index 6517412..882330d 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig > @@ -30,3 +30,9 @@ config FSL_PLAT_PM > have to know the implement details of wakeup function it require. > Besides, it is also easy for service side to upgrade its logic > when > design changed and remain user side unchanged. > + > +config LS_RCPM > + bool "Freescale RCPM support" > + depends on (FSL_PLAT_PM) Why is this parenthesized? -Scott