From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=74.125.82.193 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794248963; b=zXZkvv6fRxXZ1XT+9HCeIwgSd4537hSYVaxFu+cMfaKQIsBbpABBmDQgeCEdmtcbWyz3 AmkHomxNblnsGhOLJZ9toCu3ftc9AO511kLXNK5b/NlmKsZr7F7CEC2eNg6VV58Xs3f06 NF/7P5dfPMmkg3y1JV/bdPZ1sPRkehhM88VLL6VcZJuZX/1eEayXNIsrfAkfPwbDbbSnQ TovUsKfB1avXqHZlyJbBIKr1xcZyq458wbmxPT+l+agSDhxBT+Bu3P+x3CK66E3o9i0Il FjLP/wVF5ate4vc5lsgi5HwFEOFNFiZzEQkGrttKUCbC6v/vBtNB2EiRD7gijvGJLLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794248963; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:Content-Type; bh=KcVmoMQgperP1wPlpI/4lZIUWk5pcHjD9u34purQ6ks=; b=Gxg2k1SWYESKaxmJiC3394Z2o0J6+KKv27YRIqeGmb+CsVLzm6VZ9KntJDLsx/lnRzvM 90HKUiKv/+BnxyzseuS5xyXQwQFDftoy46Bd9Mtn/1WBnZArKDLoKahkha1J3vdZruz7M qgWfuzRYyjvhPIrBZiBspUl6cNooPp0qXwq3PSAQKyibSuPIjGNgY1yu1x0qBLHBypZOy 4HuD78nX69B5CyQ+ZoicWx9+hfOJrH3GlCmeMT11mFZoZBKQ+sCINHp+EO+P11nejHsJz 7rhXLMeouMmgPsuMC5ZI/JMg7am30YFx5Wyi8h5+x4l4vVfMdUjcb3+4VA7+1mbbBDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=X7wedxBS; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=74.125.82.193 Received: from mail-dy1-f193.google.com (mail-dy1-f193.google.com [74.125.82.193]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A9C60A383F for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 18:29:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 61A9C60A383F Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=X7wedxBS Received: by mail-dy1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-36fb88ea38cso1498213eec.1 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:29:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20260707; t=1794248962; x=1794853762; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-type:subject:in-reply-to:cc:to:from:message-id:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=KcVmoMQgperP1wPlpI/4lZIUWk5pcHjD9u34purQ6ks=; b=X7wedxBSS8iZNbIq3uVV6Lk387o+XeGOfTW6Zk2cySFVKqEWn7Djj69lXsU8s/kpKz tJiJ1NC1pNUqxiy43lTvIzQnaR1XWltnvNswRXYTYKvJhMy1Ym9sy/gLTRWhTzeoZy/r kf9IurJNAyUB0JwvE50fsKX5uraHf+5WXfCjtNq7xr/i9v+AGqhqYTaRQLpfpje/s44G JAaCcBLIk5pgtY0fMS2yln/+byA2YY2Cjh8Vsy4CPhQB/kcoPBKf8PLdF0pQZM0hwa2X mCEmy0QrvQXIQcY0xkadgOuk8+FykA/urSyQYxogIANNQn5HVGBPGbcSPTXfDKNUDh9f 93Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1794248962; x=1794853762; h=content-type:subject:in-reply-to:cc:to:from:message-id:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=KcVmoMQgperP1wPlpI/4lZIUWk5pcHjD9u34purQ6ks=; b=t2u9t0Kems0bwqBFz7S87ygHRv0vyT7gCvNiM5AXDyQdmoHGITmvYQg6wCPupIrYn0 z0jBYXf/Ko/37RkE0se/XrpEXLAW4g3pFCZR7b2QsAsmbngrmIenxDamRuJyYREJc74k ccz7eQ7sfW4J3Bnb+zsbqQ9f3LInLgNzWkvgTv/DsMWPKWgMoDpc1TOZI280WU+Iomsl IV0+O1f2YHu6yVH3iXHTUeJQMrd58Yw6RJkL1/92bsEj/QTJFG88g9q2G0dgyMXaD2+/ j8Djsd78l8v3imZVs287n+YS25C/v5X7YXd9cIw1fv9LFXWkBeM78sUikNH1MZueuiJh uu2Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AL+hErE9I8X9QvvsZHzd//kBk/zYsdUWsXNcmhZrtMssyAzfq0HR5LrUWuSLv/Ixr481fiOXSEp62q/jh52o+EA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: APuU4Z9DTO2C7LYyCHsgYSh9a2MrmhhI9MsSesv7IJYhbqwJqcn8aozB MLKIXck0RyxppL88KX/oR2qzM9bpWGMJBc4f0MUTjOIGuDpI76fZVTLd X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2bfAytVVweFdXzsAbXOl4NBdyh1vr5I5vR8/oQd5UCdU+yKjsoi+y8IuTsuze kmtXtkbm7egc81NFG/OlXPyVrjT9LYlFnr++Rf3mzFGN0Q2IDSp8A4qsT8QkSgMmtZszd+T8rc8 tGYtz4PjGj4vQOg+1VzDyJ55pPwrGoWc+yiM/nl445jDuoSisx0FsqG8Y40Etx9imiDLCxiJbeN wX7glaFy7LMUbhH0cRe/VbApEabaPFvuXM3+75mbCJwYDb2qGVnqVQcYLRKH5vNucMXYoEoBvHZ CA0H9SaQZPNnpy7sD6JNRA57hicJ1lPnC41jk5bMC13OC55tiZRrUd/FbL6XTfHzS0uIvmr/aDq n3/fPxzsHmzV859MlMvW4uMRnRE6Of+xTqX9TkpOLYfW/cTnb+/PEqE1VVkmdDFbZPQzA9d88Q0 v8oa1IK43zeklSVPMA1O+7CuWBLlUMPrRZWr5top0xw5opyljeCOWv7sPu9UUHokpDq85KIhipS pC41U7nqUiqt+ASoKlWuvxTs5iNmlQdWK7ZFaCODj2v3VWOn+FDaSL5laH+pVc1qIE3SBQ3G3fn /pCTEykYYyUw9k3ZcuD1f/U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:693c:8312:b0:36a:2473:9b2f with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3750a20b93bmr299470eec.23.1794248962308; Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:29:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:9ff:73::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-3752060c4b6sm117168eec.15.2026.11.09.10.29.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:29:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:29:21 -0800 Message-ID: <86219505a92ebc720950d87dc76662f3@gmail.com> From: Stanislav Fomichev To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, michael.chan@broadcom.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, alexanderduyck@fb.com, kernel-team@meta.com, sdf@fomichev.me, dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com, almasrymina@google.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com, bobbyeshleman@meta.com, asml.silence@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, razor@blackwall.org, leitao@debian.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, leon@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <179418737701.994134.5100743053640770189@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: devmem: add a per-device netmem TX frag size limit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > > @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ zerocopy_fill_skb_from_devmem(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iov_iter *from, > > > > size = min_t(size_t, size, length); > > size = min_t(size_t, size, iter_iov_len(from)); > > + size = min_t(size_t, size, binding->tx_max_frag_size); > > [Severity: Medium] > Is this the only place the new cap is enforced? The netmem.rst text added > by this patch says "Devmem TX frags are capped at > netdev->netmem_tx_max_frag_size". TCP MTU probing looks like it can merge > the capped frags back together later. [..] > Could tcp_clone_payload() compare skb_frag_netmem() and stop merging once > the binding cap is reached? Another option is to skip MTU probe > coalescing for unreadable skbs. Hmm, let me comment on Mina's patches, might be easier not to merge netmems in tcp_clone_payload at all? > [Severity: High] > This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the same merge check in > tcp_clone_payload() looks like it can also combine frags from different > net_iovs. skb_frag_page() returns NULL for both frags, so the page > comparison always passes and only the offsets are compared. [..] > Should the merge test compare skb_frag_netmem(), the way > skb_can_coalesce_netmem() does? Nothing later in the series changes > tcp_output.c. Mina is gonna take care of this: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261108013838.1454450-3-almasrymina@google.com/