Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: arm64: Fixes for arm64 KVM support

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 03 Nov 2026 16:37:01 +0000,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Some fixups for the previous series that introduced arm64 KVM support on
> s390. Forward-declare enum vcpu_sysreg because we are definitely going
> to need that, then make the module naming consistent and iron out an
> inconsistency in the definition of vcpu->arch.pause between s390 and
> native arm64 KVM.

It's an interesting one. Obviously, this wasn't caught by building the
upstream code. I guess this triggered with the rest of the patches?

> 
> No functional changes intended on either arm64 or s390.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Andreas Grapentin (2):
>       KVM: s390: arm64: Declare enum vcpu_sysreg
>       KVM: s390: arm64: Fix kvm_arm64 module naming consistency
> 
> Steffen Eiden (1):
>       KVM: s390: arm64: Turn vcpu->arch.pause into a counter
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host_arm64.h |  8 ++++----
>  arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile           | 12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Looks all reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.