From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211@lists.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: bcm: rpi: Fix NULL check after devm_kasprintf()
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:32:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <866606d4-927f-4996-91ff-082037db147b@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402022215.42834-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
On 4/2/2025 4:22 AM, Henry Martin wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> Thank you for your thorough review and catching the return type mismatch. Upon
> further investigation, I’ve confirmed that this issue was flagged by static
> analysis but appears to be a false positive, as all call sites already handle
> NULL checks appropriately.
>
> I appreciate your time and insight—please let me know if you’d like me to drop
> this patch or revise it differently.
If I look at the code I think the driver probe will eventually fail when
the board_type is not available although USB devices seem to be the
exception here. For PCIe and SDIO the board_type seems required so we
could bail out in brcmf_get_module_param() when there is no board_type
found, ie. returning NULL iso settings. I think I found another issue
for SDIO. Upon failure it may end up with sdiodev->settings being
ERR_PTR() so not NULL. This is not properly handled in the remove path.
So drop the patch and I will see if I can incorporate the musings above
in some driver patches.
Regards,
Arend
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 14:09 [PATCH v1] wifi: brcmfmac: acpi: Add NULL check in brcmf_acpi_probe() Henry Martin
2025-04-01 16:57 ` Arend Van Spriel
2025-04-02 2:22 ` [PATCH] clk: bcm: rpi: Fix NULL check after devm_kasprintf() Henry Martin
2025-04-02 10:32 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=866606d4-927f-4996-91ff-082037db147b@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®