mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/x86: AMX-related test improvements
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:55:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86661dd7-6ca3-dc72-dff7-782a83ba7bc5@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401221014.13556-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

On 4/1/22 4:10 PM, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> A couple of test updates are included:
> 
> * With this option [1,2], the kernel's altstack check becomes stringent.
>    The x86 sigaltstack test is ignorant about this. Adjust the test now.
>    This check was established [3] to ensure every AMX task's altstack is
>    sufficient (regardless of that option) [4].
> 
> * The AMX test wrongly fails on non-AMX machines. Fix the code to skip the
>    test instead.
> 
> The series is available in this repository:
>    git://github.com/intel/amx-linux.git selftest
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/Kconfig#n2432
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt#n5676
> [3] 3aac3ebea08f ("x86/signal: Implement sigaltstack size validation")
> [4] 4b7ca609a33d ("x86/signal: Use fpu::__state_user_size for sigalt stack validation")
> 
> Chang S. Bae (2):
>    selftests/x86/signal: Adjust the test to the kernel's altstack check
>    selftests/x86/amx: Fix the test to avoid failure when AMX is
>      unavailable
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c         | 42 +++++++++++++++++------
>   tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigaltstack.c | 12 ++++++-
>   2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
> 

These are fixes and I can take them through kselftest once the review
comments are addressed and get an ack from x86 maintainers.

thanks,
-- Shuah

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-01 22:10 Chang S. Bae
2022-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/x86/signal: Adjust the test to the kernel's altstack check Chang S. Bae
2022-06-16 22:47   ` Shuah Khan
2022-04-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/x86/amx: Fix the test to avoid failure when AMX is unavailable Chang S. Bae
2022-06-16 22:54   ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-17 22:21     ` Chang S. Bae
2022-06-17 22:29       ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-16 22:55 ` Shuah Khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86661dd7-6ca3-dc72-dff7-782a83ba7bc5@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®