From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751181AbVKUWbq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751186AbVKUWbq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:46 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:41867 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181AbVKUWbp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W5/Ul0y38LE2Duql0YfAA3a7+APCw+cUprmko0s7nR7W8R0GuMvCr3k0jLutyN9f60FHi8vKQgUWwh+OCnb7aQsc+O51w+JjYQXnYBH24bWsJF3d/jgNOvs1b9803HuXEmSO7G+RZw54WAnirnm44HG1htV6Xzc/qdTM9EAcdJs= Message-ID: <86802c440511211431p57628e01o5c8030c4e09deaba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:31:44 -0800 From: yhlu To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: x86_64: apic id lift patch Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxbios@openbios.org In-Reply-To: <20051121222429.GE20775@brahms.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <86802c440511211349t6a0a9d30i60e15fa23b86c49d@mail.gmail.com> <20051121220605.GD20775@brahms.suse.de> <86802c440511211417h737474fbt57946f4f2396b701@mail.gmail.com> <20051121222429.GE20775@brahms.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > max_cores should be 2 here. No, For E0 single core, x86_max_cores will be 1, the initial apicid can not be shifted to node id.... > > > Is there a good reason in the BIOS to not make it contiguous? > amd8111, if i lift the bsp apic id, the jiffies will not be moving...., YH