From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965955AbXC2FI0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:08:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965957AbXC2FI0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:08:26 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:49812 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965955AbXC2FIZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:08:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ES7Ycg+J8Hc9XjNhhmV+FQHgtSzhmfcmPIOq5oC+sLvkPLsdy3GuJP0pCrcAhChCaoH5nD7KeUTG+ucw6oieXMSLZcO8dYqQ+L/Bj+FToyY9pfhAxC9MDSVp/kSJ8MYmczAHO3VVdZOD0jfo+xsCDUftV6zfoJ9ArqjfwmfFwt0= Message-ID: <86802c440703282208m1f79c682q876e4d08d9216cd2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:08:23 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Jeff Garzik" Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal Cc: "Kok, Auke" , "Bill Davidsen" , "Adrian Bunk" , "Andrew Morton" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saw@saw.sw.com.sg, "Jesse Brandeburg" In-Reply-To: <460AEF65.8070908@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070325145810.GI16477@stusta.de> <460AE997.90509@tmr.com> <460AEB85.1020101@intel.com> <460AEF65.8070908@pobox.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e0c7769cfdc80c65 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/28/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Kok, Auke wrote: > Sounds sane to me. My overall opinion on eepro100 removal is that we're > not there yet. Rare problem cases remain where e100 fails but eepro100 > works, and it's older drivers so its low priority for everybody. > > Needs to happen, though... > It seems that several Tyan Opteron base system that were using IPMI add on card. the IPMI card share intel 100Mhz nic onboard. you need to use eepro100 instead of e100 otherwise the e100 will shutdown OOB (out of Band) connection for IPMI when shut down the OS. YH