mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: early memtest to find bad ram
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:43:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440803211443o7bbc539fx762e06f51c6f0fdb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0803212221390.10642@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:
>
>  On Mar 21 2008 13:03, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel.send@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> do simple memtest after init_memory_mapping
>  >> use find_e820_area_size to find all ram range that is not reserved.
>  >> and do some simple bits test to find some bad ram.
>  >> if find some bad ram, use reserve_early to exclude that range.
>  >
>  > very nice patch! I always thought that this was the proper way to do
>  > memtest - and we could in fact also do something like this after SMP
>  > bringup, and hit the memory bus via multiple CPUs. [that will need a
>  > different enumeration though than e820 maps]
>
>  Perhaps this can even be used to provide on-the-fly badram
>  patch semantics?

yes. but bad ranges can not be too many. otherwise early_res array
will overflow. then need to use memmap=nn$ss to exclude range already
found.

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-21 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-21  6:58 Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 13:08   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-21 14:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-22  5:45       ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-22  6:48         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 19:08     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 19:58       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-21 20:09         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 21:22   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-21 21:43     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-03-22  0:04   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-22 12:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-22 16:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-25 11:00         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 22:49 ` Sami Farin
2008-03-22 20:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-22 21:01   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-22 21:21     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-22 21:21   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c440803211443o7bbc539fx762e06f51c6f0fdb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®