From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764073AbYD1AeA (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:34:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751196AbYD1Adx (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:33:53 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.243]:22907 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbYD1Adw (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:33:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FUF4VLysrGC+lhCYALlnqcdFRC76Tolr2U+Zf5PJWU6C5MCiDyttiO0fXvKOerVi3bMA/GpdAMpjMIyPGrAuV/ud3pd1m/LfH2sB12YeBxkMh3Yzyz6ge25faB3ulbbpBB/fcPPSWwhI+9lAWcsnV/+S2uOw9ZKMtZChJ0kAgyM= Message-ID: <86802c440804271733o1ec17f7aye04216ce28347435@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:33:50 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Johannes Weiner" Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linus Torvalds" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Jesse Barnes" , "Siddha, Suresh B" In-Reply-To: <87hcdmnccu.fsf@saeurebad.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080426185516.GA32364@elte.hu> <20080426194143.GA8366@elte.hu> <87hcdmnccu.fsf@saeurebad.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > > Ingo Molnar writes: > > > * Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >> IOW, they'd be big enough that people hopefully don't start nitpicking > >> about some *totally* uninteresting small detail, but small enough that > >> people can read it through without losing concentration about a > >> quarter of the way in. > > > > ok. Here's the "memory management" type of changes: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86-bigbox-bootmem.git for-linus > > > > the other sub-trees will depend on these changes. I think these > > infrastructure and other improvements are mergable and pullable as-is. > > > > Ingo > > > > ------------------> > > [...] > > > > mm: allow reserve_bootmem() cross nodes > > I find it sad that this goes in now. I wrote a clean version of > reserve_bootmem() [1] and it was rejected with arguments that I did not > understand [2] and that were not further explained even though I asked > for it [3]. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/76 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/234 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/250 > > Your comment was rather unfair, because it gave the impression you did > not read the thread before replying. And you did not react to other > explicit questions from me. If you find my patches to be crap, say so > and please explain WHY so I have a chance to improve. this thread is for reserve_bootmem ? You patch is regarding to free_bootmem, and it doesn't work with intel cross node boxes. YH