From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757766AbYEMRf3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751201AbYEMRfR (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:17 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:25748 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754574AbYEMRfQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CVteqPJv2GkUI8Ar+4WvAhVl3r9/BuOqsFgCeGeCccWN++OvvjwdfWf2rTijmgXDO4HJAK9KiX2SHksejomQoKx2H4t4S+Bm+jOPCuAQ7+18iypzWnu4tiDiv1Nzx1H+ctyPinf7eld1KntPSAHL5xKA8sAzpgpOp3jtcnuPhM8= Message-ID: <86802c440805131035t18955103w94cd8fefbdabdf57@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:35:15 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make e820.c to have common functions Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Andrew Morton" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20080513130539.GL14973@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200805110030.15510.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <20080513130539.GL14973@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > remove the duplicated copy of these functions. > > applied, thanks. What a low-key commit message for the first step such a > much-needed unification! :-) > > any thoughts (or patches) about how to attack the rest of e820_32/64.c? reserve_early related to 32 bit. but could cause some regression to subarch but it seems hpa is doing sth about e820 related too? YH