From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix #2
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:52:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440805291152w1cdfa5feoac7c92bc2ecca9d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <483EB18F.4070105@goop.org>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> can we use e820 entries for that? So the domain builder could have
>> several entries for E820_RAM and E820_RESERVED...
>>
>
> I tried this, but it doesn't work; the kernel crashes during boot,
> presumably because it's trying to use the reserved memory as heap. I
> suspect the e820 maps are not registered early enough or something...
>
> (One thought: if reserving in the E820 map were enough, then couldn't we use
> it for all the early reservations?)
>
> I've attached the non-working patch below.
>
> The working kernel reports:
>
> (early) BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> (early) Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f000 (usable)
> (early) Xen: 0000000000100000 - 0000000010000000 (usable)
> (early) console [xenboot0] enabled
> (early) debug: ignoring loglevel setting.
> (early) 0MB HIGHMEM available.
> (early) 256MB LOWMEM available.
> (early) low ram: 018fd000 - 10000000
> (early) bootmap 018fd000 - 018ff000
> (early) early res: 0 [0-fff] BIOS data page
> (early) early res: 1 [1000-1fff] EX TRAMPOLINE
> (early) early res: 2 [6000-6fff] TRAMPOLINE
> (early) early res: 3 [18aa000-18ecfff] XEN
> (early) early res: 4 [1000000-18a9303] TEXT DATA BSS
> (early) early res: 5 [18ed000-18fcfff] INIT_PG_TABLE
> (early) early res: 6 [18fd000-18fefff] BOOTMAP
>
> But the non-working one says:
>
> (early) BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> (early) Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f000 (usable)
> (early) Xen: 0000000000100000 - 0000000010000000 (usable)
> (early) Xen: 00000000018aa000 - 00000000018ed000 (reserved)
it seems we miss to call sanitize_e820_map for 32 bit. we should get
(early) Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f000 (usable)
(early) Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000018aa000 (usable)
(early) Xen: 00000000018aa000 - 00000000018ed000 (reserved)
(early) Xen: 00000000018ed000 - 0000000010000000 (usable)
YH
> (early) console [xenboot0] enabled
> (early) debug: ignoring loglevel setting.
> (early) 0MB HIGHMEM available.
> (early) 256MB LOWMEM available.
> (early) low ram: 018fd000 - 10000000
> (early) bootmap 018fd000 - 018ff000
> (early) early res: 0 [0-fff] BIOS data page
> (early) early res: 1 [1000-1fff] EX TRAMPOLINE
> (early) early res: 2 [6000-6fff] TRAMPOLINE
> (early) early res: 3 [1000000-18a9303] TEXT DATA BSS
> (early) early res: 4 [18ed000-18fcfff] INIT_PG_TABLE
> (early) early res: 5 [18fd000-18fefff] BOOTMAP
>
> J
>
> Subject: xen: reserve Xen-specific memory in e820 map
>
> Make sure that the start_info and pfn->mfn translation array are reserved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff -r ad372188bccf arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c Thu May 29 13:56:09 2008 +0100
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c Thu May 29 14:34:35 2008 +0100
> @@ -40,9 +40,19 @@
> max_pfn = min(MAX_DOMAIN_PAGES, max_pfn);
>
> e820.nr_map = 0;
> +
> add_memory_region(0, LOWMEMSIZE(), E820_RAM);
> add_memory_region(HIGH_MEMORY, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn)-HIGH_MEMORY,
> E820_RAM);
>
> + /*
> + * Reserve Xen bits:
> + * - mfn_list
> + * - xen_start_info
> + * See comment above "struct start_info" in <xen/interface/xen.h>
> + */
> + add_memory_region(__pa(xen_start_info->mfn_list),
> + xen_start_info->pt_base -
> xen_start_info->mfn_list,
> + E820_RESERVED);
> return "Xen";
> }
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-11 7:30 [PATCH] x86: make e820.c to have common functions Yinghai Lu
2008-05-13 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-13 17:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-18 8:18 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-05-21 3:10 ` [PATCH] x86: move e820_mark_nosave_regions to e820.c Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 1:40 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 10:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-22 17:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 22:20 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-23 23:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-23 23:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-23 23:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 0:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 0:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 8:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 9:49 ` [PATCH] xen: boot via i386_start_kernel to get early reservations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 22:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 19:57 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-25 17:00 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix #2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 15:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-27 20:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-27 21:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 21:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 21:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 21:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 21:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 22:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-28 10:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-28 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-28 21:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-29 13:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-29 18:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-29 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-05-29 19:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-30 15:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-29 19:56 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #3 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 19:57 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #4 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 19:58 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #5 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 23:25 ` [PATCH] x86: 32bit numa srat fix early_ioremap leak Yinghai Lu
2008-05-31 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-01 5:51 ` [PATCH] x86: 32bit numa increase max_elements to 1024 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:52 ` [PATCH] x86: change propagate_e820_map back to find_max_pfn -32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:53 ` [PATCH] x86: set node_remap_size[0] in fallback path Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:56 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 print out debug info all kva Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 20:15 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 print out debug info all kva v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-03 2:16 ` [PATCH] x86: change propagate_e820_map back to find_max_pfn -32bit -v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 4:06 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 avoid clash between ramdisk and kva Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 6:53 ` [PATCH] x86: cleanup max_pfn_mapped usage - 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 6:55 ` [PATCH] x86: cleanup max_pfn_mapped usage - 64bit Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440805291152w1cdfa5feoac7c92bc2ecca9d6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®