From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Zachary Amsden" <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, "Chris Wright" <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch from LKML
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:52:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440807151152s57d26f07jf1bc9336bf287dfe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216147130.6620.184.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha
>> <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> >>
>> >> fix for pv.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 5 ----
>> >> arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 19 +++++++---------
>> >> include/asm-x86/paravirt.h | 29 -------------------------
>> >> 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
>> >> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
>> >> @@ -373,11 +373,6 @@ struct pv_cpu_ops pv_cpu_ops = {
>> >>
>> >> struct pv_apic_ops pv_apic_ops = {
>> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>> >> -#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
>> >> - .apic_write = native_apic_mem_write,
>> >> - .apic_write_atomic = native_apic_mem_write_atomic,
>> >> - .apic_read = native_apic_mem_read,
>> >> -#endif
>> >> .setup_boot_clock = setup_boot_APIC_clock,
>> >> .setup_secondary_clock = setup_secondary_APIC_clock,
>> >> .startup_ipi_hook = paravirt_nop,
>> >> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c
>> >> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c
>> >> @@ -676,6 +676,50 @@ static inline int __init probe_vmi_rom(v
>> >> return 0;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>> >> +static u32 vmi_apic_read(u32 reg)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void vmi_apic_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
>> >> +{
>> >> + /* Warn to see if there's any stray references */
>> >> + WARN_ON(1);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static u64 vmi_apic_icr_read(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void vmi_apic_icr_write(u32 low, u32 id)
>> >> +{
>> >> + /* Warn to see if there's any stray references */
>> >> + WARN_ON(1);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void vmi_apic_wait_icr_idle(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static u32 vmi_safe_apic_wait_icr_idle(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct apic_ops vmi_basic_apic_ops = {
>> >> + .read = vmi_apic_read,
>> >> + .write = vmi_apic_write,
>> >> + .write_atomic = vmi_apic_write,
>> >> + .icr_read = vmi_apic_icr_read,
>> >> + .icr_write = vmi_apic_icr_write,
>> >> + .wait_icr_idle = vmi_apic_wait_icr_idle,
>> >> + .safe_wait_icr_idle = vmi_safe_apic_wait_icr_idle,
>> >> +};
>> >> +#endif
>> >> +
>> >> /*
>> >> * VMI setup common to all processors
>> >> */
>> >> @@ -904,9 +948,10 @@ static inline int __init activate_vmi(vo
>> >> #endif
>> >>
>> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>> >> - para_fill(pv_apic_ops.apic_read, APICRead);
>> >> - para_fill(pv_apic_ops.apic_write, APICWrite);
>> >> - para_fill(pv_apic_ops.apic_write_atomic, APICWrite);
>> >> + para_fill(vmi_basic_apic_ops.read, APICRead);
>> >> + para_fill(vmi_basic_apic_ops.write, APICWrite);
>> >> + para_fill(vmi_basic_apic_ops.write_atomic, APICWrite);
>> >> + apic_ops = &vmi_basic_apic_ops;
>> >
>> > Yinghai, Looking more closely at this, based on my understanding this might be
>> > wrong for VMI. Correct patch should be as follows. Any comments?
>>
>> so you mean icr related will still use default native member?
>>
>> YH
>
> Nacked-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
because of not ccing you?
>
> What are you doing here and why aren't you cc-ing the maintainers?
did you checking tip tree for x86 changing?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 18:38 Zachary Amsden
2008-07-15 18:51 ` [PATCH] x86: let 32bit use apic_ops too - fix Suresh Siddha
2008-07-15 19:04 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-15 19:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-15 19:19 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-15 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-15 19:24 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-07-15 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-07-15 18:57 ` Patch from LKML Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440807151152s57d26f07jf1bc9336bf287dfe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®