From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752847AbYHHW0j (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758255AbYHHW0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:26:15 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:5125 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754595AbYHHW0O (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:26:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=eak1VfwlmYZ5cbUQg9wqUg815Ib1rlL0a7fhYtzbTLWTdFHw1dluVZcF8KfFX3UysG pPrRT8Vfqbj7qong6YKN3Fq+4YOpt1qu4IpSSJN2ZLVZYr37GVHi6xZLmOF/dp8Jz/Oh efGbzZC5/+mB81JpT+OjZYB/p8kSI/Th8+e4U= Message-ID: <86802c440808081526j3e04c845m99582c20b79196ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:26:13 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] dyn_array/nr_irqs/sparse_irq support v5 Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Dhaval Giani" , "Mike Travis" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <489CC684.8060607@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1218232368-31228-1-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <489CC684.8060607@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> based on tip/master >> >> to do: >> so dyn irq_desc is done, and ready to: >> make create_irq to get irq according to bus/dev/func/vector >> > > Hm... I tried to check this in as a separate topic branch, but it conflicts > against both linus and against tip:x86/core, which are the branches we > usually base topic branches on. Ingo said, I only need to work on tip/master, and you guys will sort it out. Eric's NR_IRQS patch for 2.6.27 is not in tip yet. --- Andrew picked up already maybe i need put eric's patch before alan's patch in next sending... > > I really am not convinced about the whole dyn_array concept, and > *especially* not having divergences between 32 and 64 bits with regards to > sparse IRQs. Furthermore, there are a number of checkpatch errors for this > patch series, most of which appear legit. will check it. it could be just replace irq_desc[] to irq_desc()... > > So again... any reason to not just have sparse IRQs and be done with it? another reason: dyn_arry == static in some case, so I could make sure compiling work well between static/dyn_array with sparse_irq. YH