From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@suse.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only put e820 ram entries in resource tree
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:11:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440808251011k5c80a527la5066565b8cff6f5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080825141901.GE18914@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 03:44:57PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> may need user to have new kexec tools that could create e820 table
>> from /sys/firmware/memmap instead of /proc/iomem for second kernel
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
>> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -1279,6 +1279,10 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources(void)
>>
>> res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(struct resource) * e820.nr_map);
>> for (i = 0; i < e820.nr_map; i++) {
>> + if (e820.map[i].type != E820_RAM) {
>> + res++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> end = e820.map[i].addr + e820.map[i].size - 1;
>> #ifndef CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT
>> if (end > 0x100000000ULL) {
>
> I think this will wipe out ACPI related entries also from /proc/iomem
> and kdump will be broken as second kernel needs to know about the ACPI
> areas.
>
> Though, if all these entries are available in /sys/firmware/memap then
> probably one can modify kexec-tools to grep RAM entries from /proc/iomem and
> rest of the entries from /sys/firmware/memmap.
/sys/firmware/memmap have all of them. though RAM entries from
/proc/iomem could be smaller than that in /sys/firmware/memmap because
of trimming from commandline.
YH
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-24 22:44 Yinghai Lu
2008-08-25 2:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-25 3:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-25 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-25 13:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-25 17:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-25 8:39 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-08-25 17:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-26 8:20 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-08-25 14:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-25 17:11 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440808251011k5c80a527la5066565b8cff6f5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®