From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757215AbYIDUH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:07:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754556AbYIDUHg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:07:36 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233]:21666 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754185AbYIDUHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:07:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JujiUmHaAO9s99qlO84fiwhpuF410sTM/OUIsqNcTKQfupjCYD7BJ5GObca0zlKadu AhtNYF9P5YFjxIHQSOZszXiCieAfsilnIMBJZ5EVGI5voWTvfgI3+V9MiC+JtKR2y0Lr IPis4taj0Wrrtl6+S30VwkZG5MNtF+Xe6rYrw= Message-ID: <86802c440809041307i24cce782u4937d6fd2311c6f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:07:34 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: order functions in cpu/common.c and cpu/common_64.c Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080904200421.GA24295@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1220331936-15100-1-git-send-email-yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <20080904191205.GC24990@elte.hu> <20080904193733.GA25136@elte.hu> <20080904194127.GA2542@elte.hu> <20080904200421.GA24295@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > i've pushed out the broken tree into tip/tmp.master.broken (havent >> > updated tip/master with the breakage). I've removed the broken >> > printk in kernel/resource.c that Andrew found, see commit >> > 06e44f6af324 - so that's not the cause. >> >> i've double checked that 06e44f6af324 is applied. I'll bisect this. > > bisection came up with: > > # good: [8bfd9710] Merge branch 'x86/xsave' > # bad: [06e44f6a] IO resources: fix/remove printk > # good: [282a5f84] Merge branch 'irq/sparseirq' > # bad: [a0854a46] x86: make 32bit support show_msr like 64 bit > # good: [5031088d] x86: delay early cpu initialization until cpuid is > # good: [9d31d35b] x86: order functions in cpu/common.c and cpu/commo > # bad: [10a434fc] x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev > > | 10a434fcb23a57c385177a0086955fae01003f64 is first bad commit > | commit 10a434fcb23a57c385177a0086955fae01003f64 > | Author: Yinghai Lu > | Date: Thu Sep 4 21:09:45 2008 +0200 > | > | x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev > > and the thing is, 10a434fc is way too big: > > | 15 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) > > and it's not obvious at first (neither at second) sight what the problem > is. You really need to start doing much smaller patches for such > critical/hard-to-debug code areas. > could be alignment again... YH