From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754369AbYIFTQj (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:16:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752150AbYIFTQa (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:16:30 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.228]:52251 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbYIFTQa (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 15:16:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CVD9C4NIL06co+aqPW6G2uLmJo9BBVun5OR9yn72OMOidwFziAU03Q/QaGrU2vf151 yifsl4PY5XhWLCO3REc0HS13BG9/E7hBHMZgjNju+IoKt3TYj+orwEZVTNHB09ktmJ0Q 0feHVByjpj5u8g5CC385PG8Q/JSk4CK2JkR4c= Message-ID: <86802c440809061216n5bbad56amabf9934f8bf08d57@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 12:16:28 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC_irqs Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , "Ingo Molnar" , hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: <20080906190446.GA23729@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080904183748.950151853@gmail.com> <48c02b6a.0637560a.15e9.ffffa39d@mx.google.com> <20080905080447.GC12409@elte.hu> <20080905180126.GA19334@lenovo> <20080905181111.GG27395@elte.hu> <20080905183347.GB19334@lenovo> <20080905183835.GA19215@elte.hu> <20080906101533.GA7273@lenovo> <20080906190446.GA23729@lenovo> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Maciej W. Rozycki - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:45:08PM +0100] > | On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > | > | > Ingo, how about the following approach? We don't introduce new > | > functions but rather srink the code by new printout form. > | > | Honestly, this one should probably use sprintf() or suchlike to avoid the > | mess of printk() calls building a line of output from pieces. It's quite > | easy to calculate here what the maximum size of the buffer required could > | be and automatic arrays can have variable size, so no need for the hassle > | of heap management. Calls to printk() without a trailing newline should > | be avoided where possible as it messes up logging priority if a message > | pops up from an interrupt inbetween. > | > | Maciej > | > > The easiest way would be just print this info on separate > lines like > > IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 1-1 not connected > > and just drop all this troubles :) > > I'm not sure how much memory we need for every io-apic > pins - iirc there only 32 redirection entry so it could > be about 32 bytes from stack would be enough. Will take > a look. Thanks Maciej! Ingo? no. some system could have 3 or 4 ioapic controller, and every one have 24...(like three mcp55/io55) 4*24 or old system have 1 8111 and 7 8132. will have 32 + 7*2*7 YH