mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Jason Baron" <jbaron@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v6
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:06:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440809181206h7654077dr7d56e55817926119@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D2A045.5000907@zytor.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:39 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Jason Baron wrote:
>>
>> in my testing there was no significant difference between pre-filtering
>> vs. not built in. However, there was a measureable affect of having them
>> built in vs. not built in.
>>
>
> <somewhat irrelevant rant>
>
> Okay, I'm so bloody sick of hearing people justifying bloat by saying "no
> measurable difference."  That only means that you don't have GROSS bloat.
>  Unless you have real statistics to the contrary, most people's performance
> testing is at the very best accurate to 5-10%.  This is hardly "no bloat".
>
> </somewhat irrelevant rant>

about performance difference:
1. will have printk(KERN_level KERN_tag "...\n");
2. will have tag_printk like
    #define dev_printk(level, dev, format, arg...)  \
           printk(level KERN_DEV "%s %s: " format , dev_driver_string(dev) , \
                   dev_name(dev) , ## arg)
3. still can use MACRO for compiling time
    #ifdef DEBUG
    #define dev_dbg(dev, format, arg...)            \
           dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG , dev , format , ## arg)
    #else
    #define dev_dbg(dev, format, arg...)            \
           ({ if (0) dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, format, ##arg); 0; })
    #endif
4. with /proc/sys/kernel/printk_tag/dev could modify run-time level.
5. for big chunk dump or spew, caller could use
       level = get_tag_level(KERN_DEV, &len) and compare level to
KERN_SPEW_LEVEL or etc
   to decide if need to dump it.
6. other overhead to put tag like <dev> should be ok just like
loglevel aready in the buffer

current only have one struct  {
   char *tag;
   char *name;  /* with extra : */
   int level;
}
the level is some kind of console_loglevel for that tag.

if want to go further, let every dev_printk check that. then will not
have them in log buffer

YH

      reply	other threads:[~2008-09-18 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17  8:27 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] add DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP v7 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] pci: add KERN_PCI Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: using printk(KERN_PCI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17  8:41     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 10:11       ` Robert Richter
2008-09-17 16:25         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 22:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-17 23:03     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] acpi: add KERN_ACPI v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] apci: dump slit with printk(KERN_ACPI...) Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 18:19   ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-09-17 18:28     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17 18:56       ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-09-17  8:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: add KERN_APIC Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17  8:45     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 12:08       ` Frans Pop
2008-09-17 16:30         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-17  8:55 ` [PATCH 0/6] loglevel=pci:8,acpi:8,apic=8 support v6 Andrew Morton
2008-09-17  9:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 18:46     ` Jason Baron
2008-09-17 19:25       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 10:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 15:36           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 15:50             ` Jason Baron
2008-09-18 15:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 16:19                 ` Jason Baron
2008-09-18 18:39                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 19:06                     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c440809181206h7654077dr7d56e55817926119@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®