From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754534AbYIVShn@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754534AbYIVShn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:37:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754086AbYIVSh0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:37:26 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:37384 "EHLO
	rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754049AbYIVShY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:37:24 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=ruoTQKyr+THnsbkVbmBuC3P2SEnmNAsK/jkpYJ0G36PWQ8Efx3LbHDs3tJkOmwxBuj
         6EKmp2/iGGxbqjlxt3132U8WJyfa91qgFCremv/MlcrQW4l7C4kx0RMM/PgG/STZ37zM
         Vu/WmXe+0z7K+C8nmboy/ojNAyUbl2+AI6H/M=
Message-ID: <86802c440809221137v63e46951j78ae337275872b58@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:37:21 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: do_boot_cpu - add check if we have ESR register
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080922101505.GF7663@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080922093603.GC7663@localhost> <20080922095148.GD7663@localhost>
	 <86802c440809220257q4e1b4c81o534c957d919a6b3c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080922101505.GF7663@localhost>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Yinghai Lu - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:57:17AM -0700]
> | >
> | > Actually it's resend of the patch. On previous attempt
> | > Yinghai was proposed to choose:
> | >
> | >> one apic_version or boot_cpu_apic_version could be enough
> | >
> | > but I think it should be different patch which does cleaning
> | > up variables usage. So for now I think _this_ patch is enough
> | > since idea is to prevent of touching nonexistant register rather
> | > code cleaning (whci could be done later).
> |
> | do we have systems that have mixed cpu supported with different apic version?
> |
> | YH
> |
>
> Yinghai what was the reason of this question? I've a suspicious
> you're planning to test apic version early and only _once_ so
> eliminating APIC_INTERGRATED call? Am I right?

want to put more thing in genapic...

YH