From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753739AbYI2R4k (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:56:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751558AbYI2R4a (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:56:30 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:40697 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751377AbYI2R4a (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:56:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=BZFVYMPq6E82oqSEZm3aCDVLiXvIuXQCwDFnL+2wEHIfXGQKIwurECCNRmLHjWxgoP 2uppxJqZ3UFfc1zeCTBR7DSCR8H/Tumuq0vJjSytVdH1RgB+pI436I8slc1qdbD/oHiH 2Dxpr+3ZBl//nJGZblwbI4iTvPLf3VEeFiI3A= Message-ID: <86802c440809291056m7369062ft6b16d17299ca5701@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:56:29 -0700 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "Krzysztof Helt" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable CPUID on Cyrix cpus with CPUID disabled Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" In-Reply-To: <20080929192407.1c31fe90.krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080929192407.1c31fe90.krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9f763776a15f2a0d Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Krzysztof Helt wrote: > From: Krzysztof Helt > > The macros setCx86_old() and getCx86_old() do not > work as a comment says in the processor-cyrix.h. > > Use working inline functions instead to enable > the CPUID instriction on Cyrix cpus. > > Tested on IBM 6x86MX cpu with disabled the > CPUID instruction. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt > --- > > This patch is against the linux-next tree (20080819) > as it contains the following patch: > > x86, cyrix: debug > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=026e2c05ef58ef413e2d52696f125d5ea1aa8bce > > The linux-2.6-tip tree has not the Ingo's patch so it > does not require my patch. > > I am confused. Is the x86 detection code for Cyrix > cpus is right in the linux-next or in the linux-2.6-tip? > Should I prepare patches against the linux-2.6-tip > or linux-next? linux-2.6-tip. YH