Re: [patch]x86: arch_add_memory round up address

["Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:04 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
>> > Round up address to a page, otherwise the last page isn't mapped.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |    3 ++-
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c    2008-10-09 11:42:33.000000000 +0800
>> > +++ linux/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c 2008-10-09 11:43:22.000000000 +0800
>> > @@ -721,7 +721,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start,
>> >        unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> >        int ret;
>> >
>> > -       last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size-1);
>> > +       last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start,
>> > +               round_up(start + size-1, PAGE_SIZE));
>> >        if (last_mapped_pfn > max_pfn_mapped)
>> >                max_pfn_mapped = last_mapped_pfn;
>>
>> should use
>>
>> last_mapped_pfn = init_memory_mapping(start, start + size);
> No, this still can't guarantee page aligned, though this works in my
> test

who will call arch_add_memory? that should be start and size already
be page aligned.

YH