From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/apic: match destination id with destination mode
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:21:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440906261421g77fd0e50j7dfdbbdcc7c0b8eb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07556412B7E7@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Pan, Jacob jun<jacob.jun.pan@intel.com> wrote:
> From 791a44040dde6670f90a729cf91ed302d84b875a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:51:08 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/apic: match destination id with destination mode
>
> current code assigns logical destination IDs regardless of destination modes, this is not a problem since we only use logical delivery so far. but it could be a problem with platforms only supports physical mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 4d0216f..c84dc3d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,10 @@ int setup_ioapic_entry(int apic_id, int irq,
> } else {
> entry->delivery_mode = apic->irq_delivery_mode;
> entry->dest_mode = apic->irq_dest_mode;
> - entry->dest = destination;
> + if (apic->irq_dest_mode)
> + entry->dest = destination;
> + else /* physical ID of BSP */
> + entry->dest = boot_cpu_id;
> entry->vector = vector;
> }
>
> @@ -1576,7 +1579,10 @@ static void __init setup_timer_IRQ0_pin(unsigned int apic_id, unsigned int pin,
> */
> entry.dest_mode = apic->irq_dest_mode;
> entry.mask = 0; /* don't mask IRQ for edge */
> - entry.dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid(apic->target_cpus());
> + if (!apic->irq_dest_mode)
> + entry.dest = boot_cpu_id; /* physical apic id */
> + else
> + entry.dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid(apic->target_cpus());
> entry.delivery_mode = apic->irq_delivery_mode;
> entry.polarity = 0;
> entry.trigger = 0;
> @@ -2343,7 +2349,8 @@ set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, const struct cpumask *mask)
> dest = set_desc_affinity(desc, mask);
> if (dest != BAD_APICID) {
> /* Only the high 8 bits are valid. */
> - dest = SET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(dest);
> + if (apic->irq_dest_mode)
> + dest = SET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(dest);
> __target_IO_APIC_irq(irq, dest, cfg);
> ret = 0;
> }
> @@ -3273,9 +3280,11 @@ static int msi_compose_msg(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int irq, struct msi_ms
> err = assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus());
> if (err)
> return err;
> -
> - dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(cfg->domain, apic->target_cpus());
> -
> + if (apic->irq_dest_mode)
> + dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(cfg->domain,
> + apic->target_cpus());
> + else
> + dest = boot_cpu_id;
> if (irq_remapped(irq)) {
> struct irte irte;
> int ir_index;
> @@ -3339,8 +3348,10 @@ static int set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask)
> struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> struct msi_msg msg;
> unsigned int dest;
> -
> - dest = set_desc_affinity(desc, mask);
> + if (apic->irq_dest_mode)
> + dest = set_desc_affinity(desc, mask);
> + else
> + dest = boot_cpu_id;
> if (dest == BAD_APICID)
> return -1;
>
for physical flat mode
apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid() is
static unsigned int physflat_cpu_mask_to_apicid(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
{
int cpu;
/*
* We're using fixed IRQ delivery, can only return one phys APIC ID.
* May as well be the first.
*/
cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask);
if ((unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu);
else
return BAD_APICID;
}
so this patch will put all ioapic routing to boot_cpu_id what is that?
how can you assume that is is apic id.?
that is NOT apic id.
the patch is totally wrong.
Nacked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-26 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-26 0:15 Pan, Jacob jun
2009-06-26 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 19:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-26 20:59 ` Pan, Jacob jun
2009-06-26 21:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-27 17:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 19:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-26 21:21 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-06-26 21:41 ` Pan, Jacob jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c440906261421g77fd0e50j7dfdbbdcc7c0b8eb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®