From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, apic: use 0x20 for the IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR instead of 0x1f
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:50:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c441001081850s4965fca3y4cba3782d3eaeec6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B47E7A9.6090904@zytor.com>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> However, my most serious concern with this patch is that there is a
> fairly significant change due to this patch, which is that the legacy
> IRQ vectors now fall *inside* the FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR range. This isn't
> a bad thing -- in fact, it is fundamentally the right thing to do
> especially once we consider platforms which *don't* have the legacy IRQs
> -- but it makes me scared of unexpected behavior changes as a result.
> If you feel confident that that is not the case, could you outline why
> it shouldn't be a problem?
>
if it is not used by ioapic instead of legacy,
do we need to re assign irq0 to irq15 domain from all cpus to
apic->vector_allocation_domain()?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-09 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-09 2:09 Suresh Siddha
2010-01-09 2:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-09 2:50 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-11 22:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-11 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-11 23:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-11 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 0:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-12 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 0:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-12 0:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 1:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-12 2:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 2:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-12 10:25 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-13 20:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-13 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 20:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 0:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-11 23:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-11 23:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-09 3:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-09 3:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-09 3:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86802c441001081850s4965fca3y4cba3782d3eaeec6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®