From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@amazon.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jthoughton@google.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, graf@amazon.de, jgowans@amazon.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, derekmn@amazon.com, nsaenz@amazon.es,
xmarcalx@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: ioctl for populating guest_memfd
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:55:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86811253-a310-4474-8d0a-dad453630a2d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024095429.54052-1-kalyazin@amazon.com>
On 10/24/24 11:54, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
> Firecracker currently allows to populate guest memory from a separate
> process via UserfaultFD [1]. This helps keep the VMM codebase and
> functionality concise and generic, while offloading the logic of
> obtaining guest memory to another process. UserfaultFD is currently not
> supported for guest_memfd, because it binds to a VMA, while guest_memfd
> does not need to (or cannot) be necessarily mapped to userspace,
> especially for private memory. [2] proposes an alternative to
> UserfaultFD for intercepting stage-2 faults, while this series
> conceptually compliments it with the ability to populate guest memory
> backed by guest_memfd for `KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM` VMs.
>
> Patches 1-3 add a new ioctl, `KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE`, that uses a
> vendor-agnostic implementation of `post_populate` callback.
>
> Patch 4 allows to call the ioctl from a separate (non-VMM) process. It
> has been prohibited by [3], but I have not been able to locate the exact
> justification for the requirement.
The justification is that the "struct kvm" has a long-lived tie to a
host process's address space.
Invoking ioctls like KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and KVM_RUN from
different processes would make things very messy, because it is not
clear which mm you are working with: the MMU notifier is registered for
kvm->mm, but some functions such as get_user_pages do not take an mm for
example and always operate on current->mm.
In your case, it should be enough to add a ioctl on the guestmemfd
instead? But the real question is, what are you using
KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM for?
Paolo
> Questions:
> - Does exposing a generic population interface via ioctl look
> sensible in this form?
> - Is there a path where "only VMM can call KVM API" requirement is
> relaxed? If not, what is the recommended efficient alternative for
> populating guest memory from outside the VMM?
>
> [1]: https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker/blob/main/docs/snapshotting/handling-page-faults-on-snapshot-resume.md
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/CADrL8HUHRMwUPhr7jLLBgD9YLFAnVHc=N-C=8er-x6GUtV97pQ@mail.gmail.com/T/
> [3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6d4e4c4fca5be806b888d606894d914847e82d78
>
> Nikita
>
> Nikita Kalyazin (4):
> KVM: guest_memfd: add generic post_populate callback
> KVM: add KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE ioctl for guest_memfd
> KVM: allow KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE in another mm
> KVM: document KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE ioctl
>
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 9 +++++++++
> virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> base-commit: c8d430db8eec7d4fd13a6bea27b7086a54eda6da
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 9:54 Nikita Kalyazin
2024-10-24 9:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: guest_memfd: add generic post_populate callback Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-22 18:40 ` Mike Day
2024-11-25 11:46 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2024-10-24 9:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: add KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE ioctl for guest_memfd Nikita Kalyazin
2024-10-24 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: allow KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE in another mm Nikita Kalyazin
2024-10-24 9:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: document KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_POPULATE ioctl Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-20 12:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: ioctl for populating guest_memfd Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-20 13:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 15:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 15:58 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-20 16:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 16:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 17:21 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-20 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-21 16:46 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-26 16:04 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2024-11-28 12:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 13:55 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-11-20 17:41 ` Nikita Kalyazin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86811253-a310-4474-8d0a-dad453630a2d@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=derekmn@amazon.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.de \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kalyazin@amazon.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nsaenz@amazon.es \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=xmarcalx@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®