From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix some futex_numa_mpol subtests
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:54:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ace13c-b9fd-42e3-84e5-e3716ca21645@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250810222742.290485-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 8/10/25 6:27 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> The "Memory out of range" subtest of futex_numa_mpol assumes that memory
> access outside of the mmap'ed area is invalid. That may not be the case
> depending on the actual memory layout of the test application. When
> that subtest was run on an x86-64 system with latest upstream kernel,
> the test passed as an error was returned from futex_wake(). On another
> powerpc system, the same subtest failed because futex_wake() returned 0.
>
> Bail out! futex2_wake(64, 0x86) should fail, but didn't
>
> Looking further into the passed subtest on x86-64, it was found that an
> -EINVAL was returned instead of -EFAULT. The -EINVAL error was returned
> because the node value test with FLAGS_NUMA set failed with a node value
> of 0x7f7f. IOW, the futex memory was accessible and futex_wake() failed
> because the supposed node number wasn't valid. If that memory location
> happens to have a very small value (e.g. 0), the test will pass and no
> error will be returned.
>
> Since this subtest is non-deterministic, it is dropped unless we
> explicitly set a guard page beyond the mmap region.
>
> The other problematic test is the "Memory too small" test. The
> futex_wake() function returns the -EINVAL error code because the given
> futex address isn't 8-byte aligned, not because only 4 of the 8 bytes
> are valid and the other 4 bytes are not. So proper name of this subtest
> is changed to "Mis-aligned futex" to reflect the reality.
>
> Fixes: 3163369407ba ("selftests/futex: Add futex_numa_mpol")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Ping! Any comment or suggested change?
-Longman
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_numa_mpol.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_numa_mpol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_numa_mpol.c
> index a9ecfb2d3932..802c15c82190 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_numa_mpol.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_numa_mpol.c
> @@ -182,12 +182,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> if (futex_numa->numa == FUTEX_NO_NODE)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("NUMA node is left uninitialized\n");
>
> - ksft_print_msg("Memory too small\n");
> + /* FUTEX2_NUMA futex must be 8-byte aligned */
> + ksft_print_msg("Mis-aligned futex\n");
> test_futex(futex_ptr + mem_size - 4, 1);
>
> - ksft_print_msg("Memory out of range\n");
> - test_futex(futex_ptr + mem_size, 1);
> -
> futex_numa->numa = FUTEX_NO_NODE;
> mprotect(futex_ptr, mem_size, PROT_READ);
> ksft_print_msg("Memory, RO\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-10 22:27 Waiman Long
2025-08-18 15:54 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-08-19 7:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-19 12:22 ` André Almeida
2025-08-19 19:46 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86ace13c-b9fd-42e3-84e5-e3716ca21645@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®