Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add MSC Technologies

[Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>]

On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 19:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/07/2022 17:00, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > Add "msc" vendor prefix for MSC Technologies GmbH
> > (https://www.msc-technologies.eu).
> 
> Does not really work - leads to Avnet, so there is no MSC anymore?
> 

It still seems to be used as branding by Avnet.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - New addition
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > index 0496773a3c4d..1658357bc1c4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > @@ -816,6 +816,8 @@ patternProperties:
> >    "^mrvl,.*":
> >      description: Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
> >      deprecated: true
> > +  "^msc,.*":
> > +    description: MSC Technologies GmbH.
> 
> This should be rather msct or msctech, but anyway in fact you maybe
> should use avnet?
> 

My rationale for using MSC Technologies is that is how the device is
described on the website as being a MSC device. I think the
amalgamation of the MSC website into Avnet's has happened in the last
year or so. I assume a new device released in the near future would be
branded more directly as an Avnet device, or maybe not, I see that the
i.MX 9 is being described as "MSC SM2S-IMX93".

I'll switch to msctech unless there are objections to that.

Martyn

> >    "^mscc,.*":
> >      description: Microsemi Corporation
> >    "^msi,.*":
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof