From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: christian@brauner.io, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
gladkov.alexey@gmail.com, walken@google.com,
bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de, avagin@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: proc: fix error return code of proc_map_files_readdir()
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:11:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86f9dae2-7bb1-4555-44a4-24045260916b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEfG54xMM7OtPEE5@localhost.localdomain>
On 2021/3/10 3:05, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:30:23AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
>>> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
>>> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
>>> @@ -2332,8 +2332,10 @@ proc_map_files_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
>>> goto out_put_task;
>>>
>>> mm = get_task_mm(task);
>>> - if (!mm)
>>> + if (!mm) {
>>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>>> goto out_put_task;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> ret = mmap_read_lock_killable(mm);
>> Is there something in particular that makes you think that returning ENOENT is
>> the correct behavior in this case? Try 'ls /proc/$pid/map_files' where pid is a
>> kernel thread; it's an empty directory, which is probably intentional. Your
>> patch would change reading the directory to fail with ENOENT.
> Yes. 0 from readdir means "no more stuff", not an error.
Thanks for your reply and explanation.
I am sorry for the false report...
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 9:55 Jia-Ju Bai
2021-03-09 18:30 ` Eric Biggers
2021-03-09 19:05 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2021-03-10 1:11 ` Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86f9dae2-7bb1-4555-44a4-24045260916b@gmail.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome