From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
<julien.thierry@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:40:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86muw29b5y.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc0393df-22d4-0334-91ce-8ddcdbf5ec21@huawei.com>
Hi Hanjun,
On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:25:26 +0100,
Hanjun Guo wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2018/6/6 17:13, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to just return that the affinity setting request
> > is impossible to satisfy? And more to the point, how comes we end-up
> > in such a case?
>
> The system is booted with a NUMA node has no memory attaching to it
> (memory-less NUMA node), also with NR_CPUS less than CPUs presented
> in MADT, so CPUs on this memory-less node are not brought up, and
> this NUMA node will not be online too. But the ITS attaching to this NUMA
> domain is still valid and represented via SRAT to ITS driver.
>
> This is really the corner case which is triggered by the boot testing
> when enabling our D06 boards, but it's a bug :)
I'm not debating the bringing up (or lack thereof) of the secondary
CPUs. I'm questioning the affinity setting to unavailable CPUs, and I
really wonder what the semantic of such a thing is (and how we end-up
there).
Anyway, I'll plug the "SYNC to unmapped collection" issue (which
definitely needs fixing), but I'd like to understand the above.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-10 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-06 2:40 Yang Yingliang
2018-06-06 9:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-07 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-10 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2018-06-11 9:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-11 11:23 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86muw29b5y.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome